<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Data converters</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/</link><description>&lt;p style="display:none;"&gt;blank&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: DAC8801: How to use DAC8801 and DAC8811</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1678157/dac8801-how-to-use-dac8801-and-dac8811/6474014</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c8667d50-57e1-4fb7-9383-47d6cc0a4a9d</guid><dc:creator>Joseph Wu</dc:creator><description>Takahashi-san, The DAC8801 can be set up as a voltage output DAC and it does require an external op-amp for buffering. There are a several circuits that are shown in the datasheet. It uses the output current going through RFB to set the output voltage. Here&amp;#39;s a circuit that gives a bipolar DAC output: It is modified later in the datasheet to show a different bipolar output. Here&amp;#39;s another circuit that gives a unipolar output. In this type of circuit, it uses a negative reference to generate the unipolar output. Joseph Wu</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: DAC39RF12EVM: VCK190 DAC39RF12EVM Reference Design</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1672454/dac39rf12evm-vck190-dac39rf12evm-reference-design/6474012</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e64ac3c3-a437-452e-bdeb-cdac0ca828f9</guid><dc:creator>Matthew Kramer</dc:creator><description>Hey Shane sorry for the delay. We are in the process of testing the design with a DAC EVM and VCK190. We&amp;#39;ll have an update Monday. Regards, Matt</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LM98725: LM98725CCMTX/NOPB will EOL</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679367/lm98725-lm98725ccmtx-nopb-will-eol/6473994</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3095ec1d-d259-4fdf-a087-77579f1f408d</guid><dc:creator>Norikazu Takebayashi</dc:creator><description>We don&amp;#39;t have a product that can replace LM98725CCMTX/NOPB. VSP5610 has similar function but different channel count. BR, Norikazu</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: ADS131E08S: ADS131E08S: Bipolar supply +2.5V and -2.5V biasing and single-ended to differential configuration for AC/DC voltage sensing</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1676505/ads131e08s-ads131e08s-bipolar-supply-2-5v-and--2-5v-biasing-and-single-ended-to-differential-configuration-for-ac-dc-voltage-sensing/6473893</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 16:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2c549b1b-69db-421b-844a-62a060a1dd5a</guid><dc:creator>Sebastian Cardona Ramirez</dc:creator><description>Hi Dale, I hope you&amp;#39;re doing well. I was discussing a current-sensing design challenge, and another colleague suggested a pseudo-differential approach to potentially omit an extra op-amp (TLV9062). Specifically, they suggested connecting the VOUT of the TMCS1100 to INP of the ADC, and tying the INN of the ADC to the TMCS1100&amp;#39;s VREF instead of GND. Since you support the ADC side, I wanted to check with you: Do you think this approach is correct and safe for the ADS131E08, or are there any common-mode or reference considerations I should keep in mind? Thanks a lot for your help and guidance! Best regards,</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: DAC38J84: DAC38J84 SERDES Input Common-Mode Voltage Issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1674972/dac38j84-dac38j84-serdes-input-common-mode-voltage-issue/6473667</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d7e8ba75-5bef-4a05-b05c-6cf9b3fa4c5f</guid><dc:creator>Kang Hsia</dc:creator><description>Hello Spencer, Thank you for the note. Please allow me to investigate and get back to you. -Kang</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: DAC8871: DAC8871 low frequency noise</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679228/dac8871-dac8871-low-frequency-noise/6473521</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 11:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:263b0e9a-fcb6-4f98-bdef-1fc767cbedfa</guid><dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator><description>Hi Bal&amp;#225;zs , We don&amp;#39;t have the data for the DAC81001 in the range from 10Hz to 500Hz, but the 0.1Hz to 10Hz is available if it helps (datasheet - Figure 42. DAC Output Noise: 0.1 Hz to 10 Hz). The DAC81001 output noise depends on the internal R2R ladder resistor value only and it&amp;#39;s expected to be flat for all the frequency range. As buffers are needed on the both reference inputs and DAC output, hence the noise spectral density will look like the buffer (3x of RMS) noise spectral density (as this would be the dominating factor in low frequency region i.e. - 10Hz to 500Hz). Team will help on the DAC8871. Thanks, Sanjay</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LVC2T45: SN74LVC2T45YZPR</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679207/sn74lvc2t45-sn74lvc2t45yzpr/6473495</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5824675b-fb6a-47b7-99e9-f3c40bb0d1e1</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Salinas</dc:creator><description>Hi Ale Although we do not have specified limits on x-ray exposure, we regularly use 2D X-ray at 90kV / 1W for a few seconds in non-destructive failure analysis tests. You can use these parameters without damaging the device. Regards, Josh</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: ADS124S06: input impedance issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1677830/ads124s06-input-impedance-issue/6473454</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2ebb266b-63dd-41b1-8024-880cdd750e11</guid><dc:creator>naveen Namani</dc:creator><description>This Circuit is Working Properly for Impedance 230M ohms. but the problem is with 990M ohms. results are mentioned above 1. ADC Ref voltage is 2.5V iiternal. 2ADC Configurations    if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x02, 0x54))      return false ; // I/p MUX: AIN5-AIN4 0x54    if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x03, 0x00))      return false ; // GAIN: PGA=1, 20SPS    if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x04, 0x14))      return false ; // DataRAte : 20SPS, osc -4.096MHz    if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x05, 0x3A)) //0x3A      return false ; // REF : internal 2.5V On always.    if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x06, 0x00))      return false ; // IDACMAG`    if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x07, 0xFF))      return false ; // IDACMUX    if (ofcData != NULL) {      if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x0A, ofcData[0]))        return false ; // OFCAL0 (LSB)      if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x0B, ofcData[1]))        return false ; // OFCAL1      if (!WriteRegister(dev, 0x0C, ofcData[2]))        return false ; // OFCAL2 (MSB)</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: DAC38J84: DAC38J84 SERDES Input Common-Mode Voltage Issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1674972/dac38j84-dac38j84-serdes-input-common-mode-voltage-issue/6473445</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:59b6a2f4-8f3c-4e78-a806-e1ea37e8f68f</guid><dc:creator>Spencer Chen</dc:creator><description>Hi Kang, Thank you for your support. After adjusting the power-up ramp rates of several power rails, we observed that the SERDES input common-mode voltage on one DAC now initializes correctly. As a result, this DAC is able to establish the JESD link and operate normally. Based on this observation, I still believe that the SERDES common-mode voltage is the primary blocker in our issue. When the common-mode voltage is incorrect (approximately 0.3 V instead of the expected level), the JESD receiver is unable to function properly. Could you please help clarify the requirements and startup conditions for the SERDES input common-mode voltage generation circuit? My understanding is that this common-mode voltage is generated by an internal on-chip regulator or bias/reference circuit. If so: Which power rails are involved in generating this voltage? Are there any requirements on power-up sequence or ramp rate? Is there any possibility that the internal regulator or bias circuitry could fail to initialize correctly if the supplies ramp too slowly or in an unexpected order? Is there any recommended method to monitor or verify the startup status of this internal common-mode generator? Since modifying the power ramp characteristics resolved the issue on one DAC, we suspect that the initialization of the internal bias/common-mode generation circuitry may be sensitive to the power-up behavior. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Spencer Chen</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: ADS9817: Inquiry regarding output code fluctuation and stability issues on ADS9817</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1675320/ads9817-inquiry-regarding-output-code-fluctuation-and-stability-issues-on-ads9817/6473436</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d36e514f-036e-4af0-a9c0-08466606c905</guid><dc:creator>?? ??</dc:creator><description>Hello, I am writing to follow up on this request. It has been two weeks since I submitted my inquiry, and I would appreciate an update on its status. Thank you, Toshimasa Miura</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: MSPM0G3518-Q1: ADC+DMA Data jump</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679108/mspm0g3518-q1-adc-dma-data-jump/6473111</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 03:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6c466d37-d214-4ac4-908b-c83a5336f00a</guid><dc:creator>Sal Ye</dc:creator><description>Hi Henry, [quote userid=&amp;quot;714646&amp;quot; url=&amp;quot;~/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679108/mspm0g3518-q1-adc-dma-data-jump&amp;quot;] the data received by the application layer fluctuates [/quote] Can you clarify the fluctuate pattern of the ADC data? How do you trigger the next ADC conversion? B.R. Sal</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LM98725: LM98725CCMTX/NOPB will EOL</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679367/lm98725-lm98725ccmtx-nopb-will-eol</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 03:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3fb472a3-dc83-4959-b84b-8b7a4d94f394</guid><dc:creator>Zoe Ko</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LM98725 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: VSP5610 Hi team, LM98725CCMTX/NOPB will EOL and customer&amp;#39;s sensor is CCD. Could you help cuggest customer to move to which TI solution? Thank you!</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/tags/VSP5610">VSP5610</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/tags/LM98725">LM98725</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LVC2T45: SN74LVC2T45YZPR</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679207/sn74lvc2t45-sn74lvc2t45yzpr/6473084</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1d646c27-aecc-4b03-b683-c44c2b7c146f</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Salinas</dc:creator><description>Hello Ale, We are looking into this and will respond shortly. Regards, Josh</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TRF1305B1-D2D-EVM: Return/Exchange Request ( TRF1305B1-D2D-EVM)</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1670895/trf1305b1-d2d-evm-return-exchange-request-trf1305b1-d2d-evm/6473040</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 01:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:64a582b7-6f74-4241-bacf-776bf007408e</guid><dc:creator>Swan Pham</dc:creator><description>Thank you for replying. I am re-attaching the photo of the TRF1305B1-D2D-EVM board. Here are the details of our initial setup and test out of the box: Before applying any power, we measured the static resistance between VS+ and GND using a multimeter. It showed a direct short circuit of 1.2 Ω . Subsequently, we attempted to power the board by applying +2.5V and -2.5V to power terminal J12 using a dual DC power supply. However, we suspect an internal short circuit on the VS+ power rail, which prevents the board from functioning properly. Since the 1.2 Ω short between VS+ and GND exists even when completely unpowered out of the box, the board arrived defective (DOA). Please help approve the RMA / warranty replacement for this unit so CSC can process it. Thank you!</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: ADS1299: BIAS Protection</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679321/ads1299-bias-protection</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 22:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:7405dc9d-35e8-4183-86fe-dcd65c5ad735</guid><dc:creator>Danilo A.</dc:creator><description>Part Number: ADS1299 Hi Team, Posting on behalf of our customer. The picture below seems to be the ideal connection between Biasout and biasinv mentioned in the datasheet, IDEAL BIAS CIRCUIT, However, I intend to add a protection resistor(R3) at the output of BIASOUT to provide protection in the event of a short circuit, so the output current can be limited by R3, as mentioned below, INTENDED BIAS CIRCUIT, Please let me know if adding R3 does not cause any harm to the operation of the Bias circuit&amp;#39;s internal op-amp. In one of Texas Instruments&amp;#39; document - Improving Common-Mode Rejection Using the Right-Leg Drive Amplifier, In page-5, figure-4, it is mentioned that splitting Rp as RP1 and RP2(just after the output), so only RP1 comes in parallel with Zg and RP2 still works as current limiting resistor, please take a look at the below picture, By incorporating a similar method, can i make the following circuit, Regards, Danilo</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/tags/ADS1299">ADS1299</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/tags/Medical%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2bhealthcare">Medical &amp;amp; healthcare</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: ADS1293: Advice for stabilizing RSTB pin</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1673492/ads1293-advice-for-stabilizing-rstb-pin/6472854</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 21:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d60a222a-b741-4e8a-a487-90afbebaa3c4</guid><dc:creator>Ryan Andrews</dc:creator><description>Hello Sven, Thank you for your post. I do not see a reason against using a lower pull-up resistor value on a digital I/O pin such as 10k-100kΩ. Regards, Ryan</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: TSG06D00EVM: Can you provide design files for this board?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1679296/tsg06d00evm-can-you-provide-design-files-for-this-board</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c1320440-ea7a-4606-8303-ebb224d2efe0</guid><dc:creator>Cornelius Wallace</dc:creator><description>Part Number: TSG06D00EVM Hello team, Can you provide the design files for this EVM evaluation platform/board? Is this available for sale? Your website does not show any price and it only has a button to request. How is the USB-TMC implemented? Do you have example source code for the implementation? I assume this is using some TI microcontroller like C2000? I am very interested to know more on how to implement. Thank you</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/tags/TSG06D00EVM">TSG06D00EVM</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TRF1305B1-D2D-EVM: Return/Exchange Request ( TRF1305B1-D2D-EVM)</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1670895/trf1305b1-d2d-evm-return-exchange-request-trf1305b1-d2d-evm/6472666</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f640cbdc-7ad1-4dfc-aaa4-866acfe81ca0</guid><dc:creator>Keyur Tejani</dc:creator><description>Swan, Sorry for the delay; seems we missed this post. All our EVMs are tested before getting stocked for shipments. Can you please share the details of the configuration and test setup when the EVM was first tested out of the box? You mention &amp;quot;as shown in the picture&amp;quot; in your post but I am not able to see a picture. Keyur</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: ADS131E08S: ADS131E08S: Bipolar supply +2.5V and -2.5V biasing and single-ended to differential configuration for AC/DC voltage sensing</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1676505/ads131e08s-ads131e08s-bipolar-supply-2-5v-and--2-5v-biasing-and-single-ended-to-differential-configuration-for-ac-dc-voltage-sensing/6472590</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:25cb594b-4eb4-4253-948c-1678dd05c6f4</guid><dc:creator>Dale Li</dc:creator><description>Hi Sebastian Cardona Ramirez, There are some issues in your schematic, please see the details below: 1. The power supplies are connected to the protection diodes in a wrong way, the protection circuit will not work to protect the ADC as expected. See the right connection in Figure 60 in ADS131E08 data sheet. 2. The capacitors on VCAPx should be connected to AVSS, not GND. See the right connection in Figure 67 Bipolar Power Supply Operation in ADS131E08 data sheet. 3. The value 200kΩ of the series resistors (R22, R25, R31, R34, R23, R27, R33, R36) in the antialiasing filters is pretty high, any leakage current will result in a significant offset error, the mismatching of the resistors will lead to a differential offset error. 4. If you do not need multiple devices for daisy-chain configuration, you can directly connect DAISY_IN pin to GND. 5. The operational amplifier is not needed to do a level shift for TMCS1100 because the output of TMCS1100 is a single-ended bipolar signal sweeping between -2.5V and +2.5V. The acceptable absolute input signal to ADS131E08 is AVSS-0.3 and AVDD+0.3, the different input voltage is -Vref/Gain to Vref/Gain. Because your ADS131E08 has been powered by &amp;#177;2.5V power supplies, so the output of TMCS1100 can be directly connected to INxP pin through the antialiasing filter, IN3N and IN4N pins are connected to GND as you have done in the schematic. You can use the operational amplifier as a buffer between TMCS1100 and ADS131E08. BR, Dale</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: ADS131E08S: ADS131E08S: Bipolar supply +2.5V and -2.5V biasing and single-ended to differential configuration for AC/DC voltage sensing</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/data-converters-group/data-converters/f/data-converters-forum/1676505/ads131e08s-ads131e08s-bipolar-supply-2-5v-and--2-5v-biasing-and-single-ended-to-differential-configuration-for-ac-dc-voltage-sensing/6472448</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 15:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:cf0dda92-61a7-49c8-946c-cbe94155f228</guid><dc:creator>Sebastian Cardona Ramirez</dc:creator><description>Hi Dale, Thank you for the clarification regarding the TMCS1100A1; as you can see, I am actually using the TMCS1100A3 for current sensing on channels 3 and 4! I&amp;#39;ll make sure to direct any specific sensor-only questions to the Sensor forum if needed. Good to know that the ADS131E08 supports the 2.5V bipolar power supply. I have assembled all my schematic sections for your review: Power Supply: Generating 2.5V from a 3 .7V source. Main ADC (ADS131E08SPAG): Pin connections, decoupling, and reference setup. Voltage Front-End (Channels 1 &amp;amp; 2): Resistor divider networks and ESD clamping diodes to 2.5V and -2.5V . Current Front-End (Channels 3 &amp;amp; 4): Using the TMCS1100A3QDR sensors and a TLV9062 operational amplifier with unity gain to shift the DC level before feeding channels 3 and 4. After shifting the current signal with the op-amp to handle both positive and negative swings, what should the common-mode / reference voltage be for the negative input of the differential pair? Should it be tied to GND (0V), or does it need to be centered at (AVDD + AVSS) / 2? Since my analog supplies are &amp;#177;2.5V, (AVDD + AVSS)/2 equals 0V (GND), but I want to confirm if tying it to GND is correct or if I should generate a specific mid-supply reference</description></item></channel></rss>