Hello,
I'm looking to see if it's possible for us to migrate to the LCR4500 because of its brighter display compared to the older Lightcrafter model.
Here's what we did with the older model:
- 16 4bit images were stored in flash (15 binary+phase images, plus 1 focus pattern)
- 15 images were displayed in a sequence (by using the camera to trigger to the next pattern), with exposure time of 1600us.
- focus pattern (16th image) is displayed at all other times when in idle mode. (It's part of the sequence to avoid the load time delay since it's far faster to display an image from the sequence than switching to/from static image mode)
- No HDMI cable is needed.
In summary, the projector would be triggered by the camera to run through the first 15 images in the sequence as fast as possible, limited by the camera speed. We've had up to 200fps capture rates, which we were very happy with. Unfortunately the Lightcrafter simply wasn't bright enough for general use.
My question is: Can we do the same or something similar with the Lightcrafter4500?
I've read the user guides, which seems to indicate that it is not possible... but I'm hoping that I'm just misreading the guide and there's a way to make this work :)
Here's what I learned about using structured light mode from the LCR4500 guide:
- 4 bits = 588Hz, 1700us minimum exposure (perfect!)
- 12 patterns maximum (uh oh....)
Is there any thing I'm missing in the guide, and it's actually possible to go through a sequence of 15 (or more?) patterns at high speed using the LCR4500? If so, how?
I'm not worried about the focus pattern since 200ms image load wait time is acceptable when switching between idle and capture mode. However, that brings up another question: Would this mean it takes about 200ms to begin the sequence? Or 400ms to fill the two buffers before the sequence can start? Or is there a better way to display a focus pattern when idling?
Finally, since we generated 4bit images to load into the Lightcrafter, do they need to be in 24bits to load into the LCR4500? If so, are they then downsampled to 4bits which will effect the image palette? We picked very specific values for each pixel in the image, so I'm hoping they'll remain intact.