https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/en-USTelligent Community 13https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1667325/am62p-only-validate-first-boot-stage-in-fused-hs-se-device/6428517Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:17:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c42246d5-4453-4a22-bd57-7682f01228ecHong Guan64Hi Hakan, Is AM62P MCU+SDK used in your setup? If yes, one option is booting SBL_NULL to validate the very first user bootloader. https://software-dl.ti.com/mcu-plus-sdk/esd/AM62PX/12_00_00_27/exports/docs/api_guide_am62px/EXAMPLES_DRIVERS_SBL_NULL.html https://software-dl.ti.com/mcu-plus-sdk/esd/AM62PX/12_00_00_27/exports/docs/api_guide_am62px/SECURE_BOOT.html Best, -Honghttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1656091/tms320f280025c-tms320f280025c-flash-api-source-code-request/6428131Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:35:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:0e96e454-26ec-47dd-ba7e-dbf086e79112Aswin PHakan, Moving to resolved state. Thanks Aswinhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1667325/am62p-only-validate-first-boot-stage-in-fused-hs-se-deviceFri, 24 Jul 2026 08:59:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4d9c351c-53ee-4fcb-a14b-8601762a8c07Hakan CankayaPart Number: AM62P Hello, We have fused device, mainly for JTAG locking. Secure boot is no requirement, therefor we only want to verify the first boot stage (TIBOOT image via ROM Code) and then not verify anymore images afterwards. We are using the SDK for loading the RPRC images, therefor the API for authentication is automatically called. We can alter the code, but is there a cleaner way to do this (e.g. by setting a parameter or compiler flag etc.). Thanks HakanAM62Phttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1667282/msp430-flasher-unable-to-download-ti_msp430driver_setup_1-0-1-1-windows-zip-download-link-returns-an-errorFri, 24 Jul 2026 07:41:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:265145cf-a5bc-4e8c-b003-db13a0e0f84dNathan LacroixPart Number: MSP430-FLASHER Hello, I am trying to download the ti_msp430driver_setup_1.0.1.1-windows.zip driver for my MSP430 Programmer. I am logged into myTI and I receive the download link by email. However, the download does not start automatically. When I click the manual download link, I am redirected to an error page. I have tried several times, on several computers and networks, and the issue persists. Could you please provide a working download link or help me access the driver? Browser: Google Chrome on Windows 11 Board: MSP430 Programmer Software/driver: ti_msp430driver_setup_1.0.1.1-windows.zipmsp430-flasherhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1656091/tms320f280025c-tms320f280025c-flash-api-source-code-request/6426654Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:24:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:88792725-0b5e-4cea-837b-a834a461a88fHakan TOPUZAswin, I send connect request to you. Thankshttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1656091/tms320f280025c-tms320f280025c-flash-api-source-code-request/6426535Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:29:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ac79a8b6-2767-45d3-9d7f-5ea9939725efAswin PHi Hakan, Can you connect with me on e2e? Let me connect with the team and get you a link to request access to the Flash API source. Thanks Aswinhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1656091/tms320f280025c-tms320f280025c-flash-api-source-code-request/6426471Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:37:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6b33e6ab-de33-4259-a000-5e55f4a77508Hakan TOPUZHello Aswin, Can you help me about this topic ?https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1656091/tms320f280025c-tms320f280025c-flash-api-source-code-request/6426455Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:17:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:336f7139-5bf0-413e-9dc3-97aec2c67582Aswin PHi Hakan. Sira is Out of Office this week, please expect a delay in response. Thanks Aswinhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1656091/tms320f280025c-tms320f280025c-flash-api-source-code-request/6426452Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:15:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3708be30-55a0-41b2-9c3c-0555a2ee5e05Hakan TOPUZHello Sira, I send connect request to you. Thankshttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued/6424819Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:17:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2e51ed08-4a0d-46bd-8fbc-e926a1e36011Harsha Begihally ShanmukhaswamyHello, Could you please share the binary that you have tested? Let me know if you have adapted the demo application. Kind Regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1666404/tms320f28p659sh-q1-request-for-memory-stack-apis-for-nvm-memif-ea-eepromWed, 22 Jul 2026 02:21:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1a16c25d-1de8-4c02-8331-0477653d387dNgu DoPart Number: TMS320F28P659SH-Q1 Request for Memory Stack APIs for NvM → MemIf → Ea → EEPROM Hello TI Team, I am currently developing an AUTOSAR-based application on a TI C2000 MCU and would like to clarify my previous request regarding memory read/write APIs. I believe my previous question may have been misunderstood as a request for Flash programming APIs such as Fapi_issueProgrammingCommand() . However, this is not what I am looking for . My requirement is to have a memory abstraction stack compatible with the AUTOSAR architecture, for example: Application ↓ NvM ↓ MemIf ↓ Ea ↓ EEPROM / Emulated EEPROM ↓ TI MCU Flash / EEPROM hardware More specifically, I am looking for APIs or TI-supported implementations that allow the AUTOSAR NvM module to perform persistent data storage through the lower memory abstraction layers. For example, I would like to have functionality equivalent to: NvM_WriteBlock() ↓ MemIf_Write() ↓ Ea_Write() ↓ EEPROM / Emulated EEPROM Driver ↓ TI Flash / EEPROM hardware and: NvM_ReadBlock() ↓ MemIf_Read() ↓ Ea_Read() ↓ EEPROM / Emulated EEPROM Driver ↓ TI Flash / EEPROM hardware I am not asking for a low-level Flash programming API only . APIs such as Fapi_issueProgrammingCommand() are useful for directly programming Flash memory, but they do not provide the AUTOSAR memory abstraction required between NvM , MemIf , and Ea . Could you please clarify whether TI provides any of the following: An AUTOSAR-compatible Ea (EEPROM Abstraction) implementation. An AUTOSAR-compatible MemIf implementation or integration example. An EEPROM Emulation driver that can be integrated with Ea . An example showing how NvM can be connected to TI Flash-based EEPROM Emulation. Recommended TI APIs or drivers for implementing the following flow: NvM ↓ MemIf ↓ Ea ↓ EEPROM Emulation ↓ TI Flash Driver / FAPI ↓ C2000 Flash If TI does not provide the complete AUTOSAR stack, could you please provide guidance or reference implementations for the Ea and EEPROM Emulation layers that should be placed above the TI Flash API? The main goal is to implement persistent NVM storage following the AUTOSAR architecture, where the application interacts with NvM and does not directly call TI Flash programming APIs. Thank you for your clarification and support.TMS320F28P659SH-Q1https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued/6424555Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:46:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1ccfe44d-a5e4-4b00-b393-8728e46b1c8b?? ??Hello, Thank you for your advice. I tried the Industrial Communications SDK 2026 and confirmed that the sub-device starts up according to the cycle time when using the debugger. However, I have encountered a different issue. When attempting an OSPI boot for a multi-core project that includes this EtherCAT sub-device sample, the system hangs during the initialization process. The console log is as follows: DMSC Firmware Version 10.0.8--v10.00.08 (Fiery Fox) DMSC Firmware revision 0xa DMSC ABI revision 4.0 Start: load_firmware: cpuId=[255] Done: Bootloader_Params_init Done: Bootloader_BootImageInfo_init Done: Bootloader_open OK: bootHandle[cpuId] != NULL OK: Bootloader_parseMultiCoreAppImage OK: Bootloader_loadSelfCpu RESULT: load_firmware: cpuId=[1], status=[0] exec_firmware: cpuId=[1], clkHz=[800000000], rprcOffset=[0x20], entryPoint=[0x00000000] Pruicss max =3 selected PRU:3 pRegPerm = 0x30082000, dram1=0x3 Looking at the log, it appears to stop while outputting "pRegPerm = 0x30082000, dram1=0x30082000, offset = 0x00000000, size = 0x00001400". I tried adding more logging to the software to investigate, but upon checking the relevant process with the debugger, I found that the output is generated by the function `PRU_EC_FW_load` within `pru_EtherCAT.c` (part of the library `ethercat_subdevice.am243x_lp.r5f.ti-arm-clang.release.lib`), leaving me with no way to investigate further. Could you please advise me on how to resolve this issue? I am happy to open a separate thread if necessary. Kind regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued/6421962Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:40:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:78f0278f-2257-4710-9fa4-972a6babba36Harsha Begihally ShanmukhaswamyHi, Thanks for the wireshark logs. I will check and provide you the feedback. Could you please also test it with the latest Industrial Communications SDK available for AM243x target? INDUSTRIAL-COMMUNICATIONS-SDK-AM243X Software development kit (SDK) | TI.com Kind Regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued/6421940Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:22:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ae77243f-1c63-4f4e-937d-98598f3197f3?? ??Hello I will send you the Wireshark log. The data captured in Wireshark consists of frame logs obtained using the EC-Master's built-in functionality. However, upon reviewing the Wireshark log, I confirmed that the frames themselves are arriving in accordance with the cycle time. I would appreciate it if you could check this. e2e.ti.com/.../20260720_5F00_182542.zip Kind Regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued/6421905Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:52:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:eab27b61-d884-4548-9409-ccabe01ebebc?? ??Hello Thank you for your confirmation. I will provide an answer in advance. The test configuration is as follows: Main Device Board: TMDS64EVM board Protocol Stack: acontis's EC-Master Sub-Device Board: LP-AM243 board SDK: Industrial Communications SDK ind_comms_sdk_am243x_2025_00_00_08 and the MCU+SDK mcu_plus_sdk_am243x_11_01_00_19 Sample: 401_simple from the Industrial Communications SDK's Connection Configuration The test environment is directly connected as follows: [EtherCAT MainDevice] [EtherCAT SubDevice]. Synchronization Method Cycle time: 250 µs DC synchronization Please wait a moment for the Wireshark logs. Kind Regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued/6421867Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:11:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4598d4c9-e312-475d-a218-fac0c833055dHarsha Begihally ShanmukhaswamyHi, [quote userid="615798" url="~/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continued"]While the Sync0_Isr call interval was 250 µs, the PDI_Isr call interval was approximately 310 µs. Consequently, roughly every four cycles, the Sync0_Isr was triggered before the PDI_Isr, creating the appearance that the output was not being updated every 1 ms. (Synchronization setting: DC synchronization with a 250 µs cycle time.)[/quote] The PDI Isr call interval should also be ~250us. It is recommended to use the real time port extenders, for example, CU2508 for DC testing. Could you please share the wireshark logs? Also, could you please verify the minimum cycle time supported and tested by the EtherCAT MainDevice in your test setup? Kind Regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1665610/am2434-in-ethercat-sub-devices-the-callback-for-reading-input-process-data-may-not-be-invoked-in-some-cases-continuedMon, 20 Jul 2026 04:56:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8ad6f269-1ee9-4c13-bdee-86dc6c670766?? ??Part Number: AM2434 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMDS64EVM , LP-AM243 Hello, Developer Team. #1621803 Since the previous thread was locked, I am posting the continuation here. (Please note that I am posting this as a "New Question" because the "Related Questions" section did not appear.) After asking my last question in the previous thread, I investigated the sub-device processing further and discovered the following: While the Sync0_Isr call interval was 250 µs, the PDI_Isr call interval was approximately 310 µs. Consequently, roughly every four cycles, the Sync0_Isr was triggered before the PDI_Isr, creating the appearance that the output was not being updated every 1 ms. (Synchronization setting: DC synchronization with a 250 µs cycle time.) Additionally, having noted in another thread that CPU load reaching 100% could potentially delay sub-device processing timing, I used the FreeRTOS Run Time Statistics feature to measure the CPU usage of each task while in the OP state. Below are the test results obtained by taking measurements every second over a 10-second test period. Based on these results, the IDLE task accounts for a significant portion of the CPU load; therefore, it appears that the phenomenon where output updates are skipped is not caused by the CPU processing load. Given this information, could you please assist me in resolving this issue? Kind regards,Industrial AutomationLP-AM243AM2434TMDS64EVMhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1664845/am2431-inquiry-regarding-cra-compliance-and-industrial-ethernet-security-support/6420471Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:21:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:cd083825-228e-4266-a0a4-6d467c153ed3Karim Jamalthe answer is yes. All Security requirements are part of our Roadmap and be part of next releases. For early access please reach out to your sales representative regards Karimhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1664845/am2431-inquiry-regarding-cra-compliance-and-industrial-ethernet-security-support/6419958Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:19:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8a4be35f-3de0-4186-91bd-5114b3b7d29bPratheeshGangadhar[quote userid="672252" url="~/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1664845/am2431-inquiry-regarding-cra-compliance-and-industrial-ethernet-security-support"] PROFINET Does the TI Industrial Communications SDK have a roadmap to support PROFINET V2.5 Secure Access and Secure Realtime ? If yes, is there an expected release schedule? EtherNet/IP Does the EtherNet/IP stack provided with the TI Industrial Communications SDK support CIP Security ? If not, is there a roadmap or any recommended solution for implementing CIP Security on AM243x? Modbus TCP Does TI provide any reference implementation or example for Modbus Security (TLS) on the AM243x platform? Security Libraries Which TLS/DTLS libraries are officially recommended for use with the Industrial Communications SDK (for example, mbedTLS or wolfSSL)? Are there any reference examples for integrating TLS/DTLS with industrial communication protocols on AM243x? [/quote] TI is actively working on enabling security support and committed to be CRA ready with industrial communication software stack products. Schedules at this time are tentative due to development work, qualification etc. involved - EtherNet/IP, Modbus TCP and Security libraries will be available by end of 4Q 26 /1Q 27 timeframe. PROFISEC support is expected by end 2Q/3Q 27. I suggest getting in touch with TI sales for further details.https://e2e.ti.com/support/enterprise-automation-integration-group/enterprise-automation-integration/f/api-solutions-forum/1664845/am2431-inquiry-regarding-cra-compliance-and-industrial-ethernet-security-supportThu, 16 Jul 2026 07:58:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e2f02bdf-3415-4f0b-813d-e4fe12ac4fcdLee Uie-TaePart Number: AM2431 Dear TI Support, We are currently developing an industrial communication device based on the AM243x platform using the TI Industrial Communications SDK. Our device supports PROFINET IO-Device, EtherNet/IP Adapter, and Modbus TCP. As part of our preparation for the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), we are evaluating whether our current product can support the required industrial communication security features. Could you please provide information on the following? PROFINET Does the TI Industrial Communications SDK have a roadmap to support PROFINET V2.5 Secure Access and Secure Realtime ? If yes, is there an expected release schedule? EtherNet/IP Does the EtherNet/IP stack provided with the TI Industrial Communications SDK support CIP Security ? If not, is there a roadmap or any recommended solution for implementing CIP Security on AM243x? Modbus TCP Does TI provide any reference implementation or example for Modbus Security (TLS) on the AM243x platform? Security Libraries Which TLS/DTLS libraries are officially recommended for use with the Industrial Communications SDK (for example, mbedTLS or wolfSSL)? Are there any reference examples for integrating TLS/DTLS with industrial communication protocols on AM243x? Any guidance, roadmap information, or relevant documentation would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support. Best regards,AM2431