Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TCAN334, TCAN332, SN65HVD232, TCAN330, TCAN337
Can you please confirm SN65HVD232QDRQ1 will be used as an alternate for SN65HVD232QDR. We need same pinout and functionality. Is there any major differences ????
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Can you please confirm SN65HVD232QDRQ1 will be used as an alternate for SN65HVD232QDR. We need same pinout and functionality. Is there any major differences ????
Thanks for the help Clemens!
Kappala,
As Clemens said, the difference is the qualification the device underwent. The functionality and pinout are identical between Q1 and non-Q1.
Regards,
Eric Hackett
Thanks for your response Clemens. Can we use TCAN332DCNR as an alternate for SN65HVD232QDR. If possible Please suggest an alternate for SN65HVD232QDR with same pinout and functionality as we dont have SN65HVD232QDR in stocks.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks for your response Eric. Can we use TCAN332DCNR as an alternate for SN65HVD232QDR. If possible Please suggest an alternate for SN65HVD232QDR with same pinout and functionality as we don't have SN65HVD232QDR in stocks.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Kappala,
Yes, TCAN332 is a valid replacement device for SN65HVD232. The pinout is compatible and basic functionality will be the same. Other devices from the TCAN33x family (TCAN330, TCAN334 and TCAN337) can also be substituted as leaving the additional function pins (5 and 8) disconnected leave these features inactive.
Note that while basic functionality is the same, these are different designs for 3.3V CAN transceivers. Timing and protection specifications differ between devices so performance and reliability will vary depending on which family is used.
Regards,
Eric Schott