This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SN65C1168E-SEP: PEM-INST-001: Instructions for Plastic Encapsulated Microcircuit (PEM) Selection, Screening, and Qualification

Part Number: SN65C1168E-SEP

Hi,

Is TI willing to test the subject part in accordance with PEM-INST-001: Instructions for Plastic Encapsulated Microcircuit (PEM) Selection, Screening, and Qualification ?  Please advise.  Thank you.

  • The Standards that are tested for are included in the product documentation - those are the standards that we test for.

    Best,

    Parker Dodson

  • Thanks Parker.  So TI is not willing to upscreen this to PEM-INST-001 after the TI standard testing ?

  • Hi Christian,

    I believe the company associated with the account that you've registered under should have an FAE contact within TI. I'd start asking there because they will be able to get in touch with the necessary contacts that would be able to give you a more concise answer. Its just in general if it isn't something we already test for we don't do more testing as there are a ton of different standards and its impractical to have every standard tested - as with most things there are exceptions and it usually comes down to business case - but when it comes to additional standards testing I'd say the answer is more often than not - no. But I really can't authoritatively say "we will not do this"  and going through internal contacts through the TI FAEs is the best way to get a more authoritative answer but there is no guarantee that we would, and if you don't have an internal FAE contact (which I think you should) there really isn't a route to get the additional testing. 

    Best,

    Parker Dodson

  • Can you be the FAE for Boeing ?  If not can you point me to the right FAE ?  Thanks

  • Hi Christian,

    I can't - if there isn't an FAE in contact with your department than the answer is no.

    Best,

    Parker