This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPD3S014: USB used as secondary 5V power source with kill switch?

Part Number: TPD3S014
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2553

Hi, I'm interested in using the TPD3S014 as a current-limiting and reverse-blocking mechanism to allow a device to be powered from an AC power adapter or a USB port (with limited current capability). I can't afford to use a proper purpose-built part like the MAX8895 because CSP or WSP footprints are too tiny for the technology level I'm targeting.

The intention is that if AC power (from a 24V wall adapter) is connected, a P-channel FET will cut off the USB power rail. The output of the part is tied to the output of a 5V regulator attached to the 24V rail. It would appear that with the IN and EN pins tied together, this will effectively cut it off and also prevent the AC-powered 5V rail from providing power to the USB rail. One thing I was concerned about was the "output discharge" function when the part is disabled/UVLO, but it appears that once the IN pin is discharged, the output discharge circuit will essentially go high-Z, is that right?

Here is a schematic of what I'm trying to do:

I put the switch between the USB input and the TPD3S014 because in the case that the USB bus voltage is lower than the AC-derived 5V regulator's output, I don't want my 5V regulator to sink into it through the body diode of the P-FET.

How well, if at all, should this work? What might I be missing?

  • Ryan,

    The output discharge resistance is proportional to the output voltage. If you drive the voltage with some other source, then the resistance will decrease as the voltage on the pin increases.

    From what I understand of your system, you might want to consider the TPS2553 instead. It will provide the reverse current blocking that you desire, but will not discharge it's output when disabled.

    The rest of your circuit looks good to me.

    Please let me know if you need any further help.

    Regards,
    Chuck