This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: DS30EA101
What is the minimum input sensitivity of the DS30EA101?
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Michael Lu (Santa Clara):
In reply to Mark Heh:
The max insertion loss can be estimated by knowing two parameters:
1. EQ Gain Capability of the DS30EA101: From Nasser's previous post, the EQ capability is 16 dB at the Nyquist frequency of 200 MHz, assuming the source is outputting 800 mVpp.
2. Insertion Loss of the Cable: This parameter is dependent on the cable length and type that you are using to interface from source to DS30EA101 input. The insertion loss can be measured with a VNA, or it can be estimated by looking at the "per 100 ft" or "per 100 m" insertion loss in the cable's datasheet.
The Cable EQ of the DS30EA101 is designed to "reverse" the effects of insertion loss that occur as a result of the cable. Since the DS30EA101 is capable of equalizing 16 dB of loss at 200 MHz, the max insertion loss of the cable interfacing to the DS30EA101 is approximately 16 dB.
The longer the cable length (assuming the cable type and vendor is the same), the sharper the slope of insertion loss vs. frequency. Therefore, you will eventually reach a cable length distance where the insertion loss at the end of the cable begins to exceed 16 dB. Beyond this length, our cable EQ is unlikely to equalize the incoming signal error-free.
In my past experience, it is usually okay to be a few dB under-equalized coming out of the Cable EQ, as typically the DS30EA101 interfaces with an FPGA or ASIC that has some EQ and retiming capability of its own. Therefore, I think that you may be able to achieve error free operation at 200 MHz Nyquist if the loss of the cable is about -17 or -18 dB.
An 800 mV signal with 18 dB of loss is roughly 100 mV. So the minimum voltage at the input must be at least 100 mV, at best, for the DS30EA101 to equalize a 200 MHz Nyquist (400 Mbps) signal?
Is it correct that IF we have a clean signal even after this much loss through the system, the equalizer is not necessary and that a buffer with a 100mV input sensitivity would work as well? Could you help me understand this a little more?
Hi Mark, Your assumption would be correct if the only frequency content on the signal was a 400 Mbps (200 MHz) "1010" signal. However, since the incoming data can be represented by a multitude of frequencies (for example, take a "1010" pattern versus a "11001100" pattern within the data stream), the attenuation of signal for the "1010" pattern would be more significant than "11001100." This is because the "1010" pattern represents a higher frequency. Therefore, when you look at the input of the DS30EA101, it will be the combined attenuation of many different frequencies at once. The DS30EA101 is an adaptive cable equalizer, so it will adjust its EQ automatically to compensate for the estimated loss of the cable. Thus, if you send a clean signal into the DS30EA101, it will select the lowest EQ value (note that the lowest EQ value will have some residual EQ boost). However, to answer your question, if the incoming signal is very clean, a buffer with 100 mVpp sensitivity may work as well. I think something like the DS10BR150 may work if your incoming signal is LVDS (at least +/-100 mVpp incoming signal).
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.