Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TUSB217
Can anyone answer this question? Please, thanks!
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Can anyone answer this question? Please, thanks!
Hi,
For some reasons, we design the circuit of tusb217-q1 as shown in the figure below, that is, the 9th and 10th pins of tusb217-q1 are not connected, and the 5th and 6th pins are respectively connected to DP and DM signal lines.
The reason why we do it this way,Because I confirmed that D1M-D2M and D1P-D2P are physically connected through metal wires inside the tusb217-q1.And in this connection method,We have tested the eye diagram which is also OK.
Can tusb217-q1 be used in this way? And I know that there may be some slight differences between the usage method recommended in the datasheet,but is there a greater risk?
Because our product has been designed, if we modify it now, there will be a lot of certification needs to be repeated, which is more troublesome.So please make a detailed evaluation.
thanks!
When there is tusb217, from the eye diagram results, the compensation has worked.
Here are Near End Eye Measurement Set up With Pre-channel Cable.BOOST Level = 2,RX_SEN Level = high.
Pre-channel Cable = 1m:
Pre-channel Cable = 4m:
We did not test the eye diagram without tusb217.
thanks!
Hi,
Based on your test result I do not foresee great risk in this design. In the layout you should make sure to minimize the stub from (Pin 5 & 6 to DP & DM) created by having TUSB217 in the configuration above (i.e. Keep TUSB217 as close as possible to DP and DM trace). As you mentioned this is not a recommended implementation but is workable for this device.