Part Number: ISO7041DBQEVM
I am isolating the SPI interface of a MAX30003 and a micro controller with two ISOW7841EVM (CSB, SCLK,SDO, SDI, INTB). INTB Is connected to the second ISOW7841EVM. This is working fine.
Now I want to reduce power consumption, so I change the second ISOW7841EVM for a ISO7041DBQEVM and I connected INTB and VCCISO from the other ISOW7841EVM to the ISO7041. This is not working.
I try changing the SDI and the INTB of isolator and this works.
My question is, if the transmission rate is less than 4 Mbps, is there a way where a configuration that works with the ISOW7841EVM should not work with the ISO7041DBQEVM?
Would you be able to share a basic block diagram of how these EVMs are being connected to each other as well how they are being powered? This will help eliminate confusion when trying to debug.
One thing to keep in mind is the higher propagation delay that is associated with the ISO7041. This could affect the SPI communication if the prop delay of the ISO7041 is too large for the desired data rate.
Another thing that can help the debug effort is capturing waveforms for these signals. Ideally these waveforms capture input vs output and help make sure that signals are passing through the isolators as expected. This would also show if there is significant prop delay or any other physical layer issues.
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Lucas Schulte9:
I solved the problem of substituting one of the ISO7841 for a ISO7041, but now I have another question
The first circuit that I was testing is this one:
Two ISO7841 and it worked fine.
Then, I tried this circuit, replacing one ISO7841 for an ISO7041 and using the other ISO7841 as an isolated power supply for the ISO7041
And this worked too.
Now what I want to replace the other ISO7841 for a ISO7041, but I will use the ISO7841 as an isolated power supply for the moment:
This configuration is not working. The ISO7841 isolated power supply has enough current for this application. I saw the delay of the ISO7041, but I was wondering, if I only use ISO7041, I will have the same delay in all the pins. But I will have the double of delay in the SDI, won't I? Do you have any ideas?
In reply to Gustavo Guerrero1:
Assuming all isolators and their Vcc pins are being powered, the primary suspect here is the propagation delay from using two ISO7041 devices.
I recommend observing the input vs output signals with an oscilloscope to verify this, measure the propagation delay, and see if it's too much for the SPI data rate being used.
Also, are 2 isolation devices in series needed for your application?
I just wanted to check back with you to see if you still are facing any issues. I understand that you are testing the following configurations,
From the above calculation, we expect ISO7041 to support a max SPI clock of 1.42 MHz while, using same calculations, ISOW7841 can support a max SPI speed of 14.2 MHz (for 5V). Hence, it is possible to see performance difference between the two device configurations.
This should help clarify and answer your observations. I will go ahead and mark this post as closed, if you do have further questions please do respond back. Thanks.
In reply to Koteshwar Rao:
I think the problem is the propagation delay. Because if I connect all the cables in the SPI configuration to the ISO7041, except for the MISO (connected to the ISO7841), the connection works.
Thanks for doing an experiment with MISO line connected to ISOW7841 and confirming. Yes, MISO is the line that sees the most return propagation delay and it does point out that the main cause for issue is the higher propagation delay of ISO7041.
If you still like to meet 4 MHz of SPI speed, I would recommend using either ISO7741 or ISO6741 which support much higher datarates with much better propagation delay specifications. I understand these digital isolators are not as low power compared to ISO7041 but I believe the power consumption by these devices is significantly low compared to the isolated power supply device ISOW7841.
I hope the results have helped you choose the right devices for your application. Let me know if you have any other questions, thanks.
Maybe you can help me with another question related to the same issue. I think the Isolated DC/DC of the ISO7841 consumes too much. So I am planning to use one ISO7721 for the MISO and the rest of the digital channels connected to an ISO7041. Now, I am using an sn6501 with a transformer for the isolated power supply, but I was wondering if you have a more efficient solution or one with a smaller footprint.
Unfortunately, achieving lower power for isolation power supply solution would be a challenge. Since SN6501 based power supply solution is a discrete solution with external transformer, it achieve higher efficiency than ISOW7841 and hence, is going to be lower power consuming, relatively. This lower power consumption solution of SN6501 comes at a cost of higher space compared to ISOW7841.
Apart from ISOW7841 and SN6501 / SN6505B, I do not have any other lower power power supply solutions to propose. Thanks.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.