Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74FB1653, SN74FB1650, SN74GTL2014
Does SN74GTL16612 support BTL application? Is there documentation for this application.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Does SN74GTL16612 support BTL application? Is there documentation for this application.
Hi Mark,
We chatted via internal email, but I wanted to also post the resolution to E2E in case anyone else needs the information.
I think good parts to compare will be:
SN74GTL2014 (4 bit LVTTL-GTL transceiver)
SN74FB2040 (8 bit TTL-BTL transceiver)
SN74GTLPH32945 (32 bit LVTTL-GTLP transceiver)
I grabbed a few specs to compare:
Spec | BTL | GTL | GTLP |
I_OL (B port, max) | 100 mA | 50 mA | 50 mA |
I_OL (B port, absolute max) | 200 mA | 80 mA | 100 mA |
V_OL (B port, max) | 1.15V @ 100mA | 9,4V @ 40mA | 0.55V @ 50mA |
V_IL (B port, max) | 1.47 V | Vref - 50mV | Vref - 50mV |
V_IH (B port, min) | 1.62 V | Vref + 50mV | Vref + 50mV |
V_ref (range) | N/A | 0.5V - Vcc/2 | 0.74V - 1.1V* |
* Although not explicitly stated, the Vref for the GTLP device can be lower or higher than these values - these are the recommended values for GTL or GTLP operation. I would recommend staying within the 0.5V - Vcc/2 range.
Looking at the above values, I see a few things.
First, the GTL part can be setup to receive the correct voltage levels for BTL operation just by setting Vref = 1.52V, as can the GTLP device.
The biggest difference between these is in their rated output drive current. The BTL device is rated to directly drive a 50 ohm load at up to 100mA, and even supporting up to 200mA when required. The GTL and GTLP devices have much lower maximum current ratings.
In order to drive a BTL line, the current would have to be slightly reduced by adding a series damping resistor to each output on a GTL or GTLP device, or the load resistance value would have to be slightly increased.