<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Logic </title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/</link><description>Products covered in this section are Gates, Little Logic, and Speciality Logic. To post a question click New Post.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LVC2G04: SN74LVC2G04DCKR - Top marking (S/O#581830)</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672494/sn74lvc2g04-sn74lvc2g04dckr---top-marking-s-o-581830/6450545</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1b435e8d-37e2-4ee9-aa13-028b64b6bbe2</guid><dc:creator>Kent Liew</dc:creator><description>Hi Clemens, Thanks for your update. Please review the comments from my customer in below and do advise. As per customer: Our intended to purchase part is SN74LVC2G04DCKR, but the actual part in the reel is SN74AUP2G04. I did not find anywhere stated inside datasheet that both this MPN part is the same. If yes, please show / share. Thanks. Rigards, Kent</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LVC07A: Confirming the application design of the SN74LVC07A.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672867/sn74lvc07a-confirming-the-application-design-of-the-sn74lvc07a/6450533</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:012b353b-b1ff-4e2b-b538-3136d5c36eca</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Shih</dc:creator><description>Hi Kollin, Thanks so much for your prompt reply and reminder. I really appreciate your timely response. Regards, Nicholas</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LV165A: Is the design schematic for SN74LV165 correct?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672931/sn74lv165a-is-the-design-schematic-for-sn74lv165-correct/6450532</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3f57201e-b348-4c77-9973-b5ec3f80b789</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Shih</dc:creator><description>Hi Kollin, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I appreciate your prompt response. Regards, Nicholas</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: SN74AUP1G07: Operating in ambient temperature higher than what's specified in "Recommended Operating Conditions"</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1673183/sn74aup1g07-operating-in-ambient-temperature-higher-than-what-s-specified-in-recommended-operating-conditions</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ff7794e0-f6dd-47c9-ac47-46912d44ebd0</guid><dc:creator>Landon Myers</dc:creator><description>Part Number: SN74AUP1G07 Per the FAQ, TJmax for SN74AUP1G07 is 150&amp;#176;C. We&amp;#39;ve been told that if &amp;quot;the device is operated at its maximum datasheet ratings for ambient temperature and output power, the junction temperature will likely still be far below the maximum allowable value.&amp;quot; However, the datasheet only lists a recommended operating free-air temperature of -40&amp;#176;C to +85&amp;#176;C, not a maximum. Does this mean that the device can be operated above that range, provided that the junction temperature does not exceed the maximum of +150&amp;#176;C? Example: Let&amp;#39;s say I use the thermal resistances provided in the datasheet to model the component in my FEA software, and calculate the resulting junction temperature based on the power dissipated within the component. As long as the junction temp is below 150&amp;#176;C, does it matter what the ambient temperature is?</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/SN74AUP1G07">SN74AUP1G07</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LV165A: Is the design schematic for SN74LV165 correct?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672931/sn74lv165a-is-the-design-schematic-for-sn74lv165-correct/6450060</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e6c7f920-2a81-4d7d-b922-ed50f256e579</guid><dc:creator>Kollin Ewing</dc:creator><description>Hi Nicholas, The schematic looks correct. Nothing needs to be added or modified. Regards, Kollin Ewing</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74AHC1G09: Top Marking</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672915/sn74ahc1g09-top-marking/6450051</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e2f3ef54-7aa3-436f-b4d9-3450a322fd05</guid><dc:creator>Kollin Ewing</dc:creator><description>Hi Alan, The top markings show what FAB the device was manufactured in. Some devices tend to have stronger slew rates depending on the FAB, and drive strength can differ batch to batch with a stronger drive strength outputting a stronger slew rate. Regards, Kollin Ewing</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CD74HC4514: LE Upper bar</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672896/cd74hc4514-le-upper-bar/6449998</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:83c6309d-08a5-4e69-92a0-f9093f7ddfde</guid><dc:creator>Kollin Ewing</dc:creator><description>Hi Komal, Clemens is correct. Regards, Kollin Ewing</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TXS0102-Q1: Partial power-down on B side</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1673042/txs0102-q1-partial-power-down-on-b-side/6449993</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:08481444-b34a-45d9-8512-b5613e7a2657</guid><dc:creator>Clemens Ladisch</dc:creator><description>It is allowed for one supply to be disabled; in that case, all I/Os will be disabled. The TXS has internal pull-up resistors (when enabled), so you can remove R512/R513.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CD74HC4514: LE Upper bar</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672896/cd74hc4514-le-upper-bar/6449986</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:79e41862-b183-4b56-8320-a31e58856a39</guid><dc:creator>Clemens Ladisch</dc:creator><description>Yes, LE is active high and must not have a bar. The bar in the datasheet is wrong.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74LVC07A: Confirming the application design of the SN74LVC07A.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672867/sn74lvc07a-confirming-the-application-design-of-the-sn74lvc07a/6449965</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:9c89707e-4a90-499c-b389-27ec7ae2db5b</guid><dc:creator>Kollin Ewing</dc:creator><description>Hi Nicholas, I don&amp;#39;t see anything that would be a cause for concern with the diagrams provided. As for connecting to the SN74LV165A, they can connect with no issues as long as you keep an eye on the continuous output current which is rated at a max of 50mA. Thank you, Kollin Ewing</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: SN74AHC1G02-Q1: Issue with SN74AHC1G02QDCKRQ1 “cross‑coupled” power‑on behavior – request for guidance</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1665580/sn74ahc1g02-q1-issue-with-sn74ahc1g02qdckrq1-cross-coupled-power-on-behavior-request-for-guidance/6449964</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2ca47f5e-5ac8-461b-8836-a6fb45832b40</guid><dc:creator>Clemens Ladisch</dc:creator><description>Yes; small manufacturing variations can be amplified to make the latch start up in either state.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TXB0604: TXB0604RGY: Missing Package Drawing and Example Board Layout in Datasheet</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1673005/txb0604-txb0604rgy-missing-package-drawing-and-example-board-layout-in-datasheet/6449908</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:19e505ec-d968-4241-84a8-40d43edebe86</guid><dc:creator>Jack Guan</dc:creator><description>Hi Bruce, You may see this similar product with RGY mechanical information: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74auc14.pdf?ts=1786632195709&amp;amp;ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Fproduct%252FSN74AUC14%252Fpart-details%252FSN74AUC14RGYR Regards, Jack</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: MSPM0G3519: Migration from TMS570LS43x (OSEK-based firmware) to MSPM0G3519-Q1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1670947/mspm0g3519-migration-from-tms570ls43x-osek-based-firmware-to-mspm0g3519-q1/6449833</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2ab097ed-029e-41e4-9610-4cc04cb65237</guid><dc:creator>Diego Abad Sajamin</dc:creator><description>Hi Sheha, 1. I am not familiar with the existing TMS570 code or the approach used here. However, if the pseudocode or overall structure can be preserved and the MSPM0 has sufficient resources to meet the requirements of the previous Hercules device, it should be possible to reuse at least some of the code. 2. I do not have enough experience with HAL/driver layers to provide detailed guidance. I recommend reviewing the TI MSP MCAL package and evaluating with your team whether it could assist in this effort. Please note that the MSP MCAL package is intended for use with EB Tresos and AUTOSAR. For interrupt handling and peripheral configuration, consult the MSPM0 Technical Reference Manual and compare it with the Hercules documentation. 3. Although I am not an ARM Cortex expert, the architectures and other implementations differ, so you should consider the following areas: Core architecture – differences in intrinsic and handling of unaligned accesses. Memory model – stack size requirements and flash limitations. Safety features – the FuSa capabilities currently available on MSPM0 . Peripheral IP – refer to the MSPM0 TRM for detailed guidance. 4. I am not aware of any reference migration projects that I can share. Best Regards, Diego Abad</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: TXS0102-Q1: Partial power-down on B side</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1673042/txs0102-q1-partial-power-down-on-b-side</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:81f1f109-91af-49dc-aa2e-bb88a33d0711</guid><dc:creator>Pedro Mietto</dc:creator><description>Part Number: TXS0102-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TXS0102 Hi, I&amp;#39;m using the TXS0102 (snipped is below) and in our application with: A side connected to FPGA side controller, 3.3V B side connected to a few peripherals, 5.0V The 5.0V supply is enabled by the same FPGA, meaning that it is a normal use case to have 5.0V turning on and off, while side A is always on. It is not a problem to have undefined states at side B while 5.0V is off. Is our design ok with respect to power sequencing? Best regards.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/TXS0102_2D00_Q1">TXS0102-Q1</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/TXS0102">TXS0102</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/Test%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2bMeasurement">Test &amp;amp; Measurement</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: TXB0604: TXB0604RGY: Missing Package Drawing and Example Board Layout in Datasheet</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1673005/txb0604-txb0604rgy-missing-package-drawing-and-example-board-layout-in-datasheet</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:9a3e94ca-ac79-40dc-b8f4-d10b9ec6bc52</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Hsu</dc:creator><description>Part Number: TXB0604 Hi I noticed that the TXB0604 datasheet does not include the RGY (VQFN-14) package drawing or example board layout / recommended land pattern information. Could you please provide the RGY package drawing PDF and the recommended PCB footprint (land pattern) for this package? Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, Bruce Hsu</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/TXB0604">TXB0604</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/SN74AUC14">SN74AUC14</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: SN74LV165A: Is the design schematic for SN74LV165 correct?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672931/sn74lv165a-is-the-design-schematic-for-sn74lv165-correct</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:bfa95298-85ba-4345-b3af-3c8e3992ffbd</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Shih</dc:creator><description>Part Number: SN74LV165A Is the design schematic for SN74LV165 correct? Are there any parts that need to be modified or added?</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/Industrial%2bAutomation">Industrial Automation</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/SN74LV165A">SN74LV165A</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: SN74AHC1G09: Top Marking</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672915/sn74ahc1g09-top-marking</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 06:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:fd9e53e8-6d37-4454-ad35-28de561d21c3</guid><dc:creator>Alan Chang</dc:creator><description>Part Number: SN74AHC1G09 HI there, 1. SN74AHC1G09 has 5 different top marking. I&amp;#39;m asked what they means. 38QH, 3BWF, A093, A09G, A09J? 2. customer found output side has different slew rate, and cause different negative output voltage. from data sheet, Vo min is -0.5V only, 38QH over -0.5V. Top marking: 38QH Top marking: A093</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/SN74AHC1G09">SN74AHC1G09</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/Data%2bcenter%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2benterprise%2bcomputing">Data center &amp;amp; enterprise computing</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: CD74HC4514: LE Upper bar</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672896/cd74hc4514-le-upper-bar</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 05:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d83dd676-b77e-44ea-945d-3aae368975f7</guid><dc:creator>Komal Gowli</dc:creator><description>Part Number: CD74HC4514 Hi Team, Regarding part number CD74HC4514M96 ,in datasheet the description for LE pin function mentioned as below When Latch Enable (LE) is high the output follows changes in the inputs (see truth table). When LE is low the output is isolated from changes in the input and remains at the level (high for the 4514, low for the 4515) it had before the latches were enabled According to this LE is not an active low pin ,still I could see upper bar mentioned for LE .Is it a typo error or the LE should have a bar . If there should be a upper bar,please mention the valid reason. Thanks &amp;amp; regards, Komal</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/tags/CD74HC4514">CD74HC4514</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TXU0202: Lead finish Composition of TXU0202DCUR</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672544/txu0202-lead-finish-composition-of-txu0202dcur/6449255</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c2d58424-14a4-4006-aa31-e10295bffa37</guid><dc:creator>Jack Guan</dc:creator><description>Hi Kota, We are still looking into this and will follow up soon. Regards, Jack</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TXS0108E: TXS Level Translator used for DDC lines of HDMI causing issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/logic-group/logic/f/logic-forum/1672692/txs0108e-txs-level-translator-used-for-ddc-lines-of-hdmi-causing-issue/6449248</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:577b35ca-5fe6-4345-a5ff-b8b6af277be2</guid><dc:creator>Irfan Shaikh</dc:creator><description>Hi Jack, There is no external pull ups provided though. VCCA is 1.8V for TXS0108. Also, I am unable to attach the wave form of working and non-working case which we have captured in saleae. Above is the 4K and 1080- laptop captured images. The VCCA of the TXS0108E is 1.8 V , while VCCB is 3.3 V . The DDC path is: HDMI source → TXS0102DCUR → PI3WVR14412Q2ZLCEX → TXS0108ERGYR → FPGA. We observed that a 4K laptop detects the HDMI sink, whereas a 1080p laptop does not. We have measured the DC HIGH levels as approximately 5 V on the HDMI side, 3.3 V on the intermediate side, and 1.8 V on the FPGA side. We will measure the VOL on both SDA and SCL at each stage during the DDC transaction , particularly during the ACK period, and provide the waveforms for comparison. Please let us know if there is a recommended way to evaluate the interaction between the TXS0102 and TXS0108E internal pull-ups in this cascaded configuration. Regards, Irfan Below is the attached Saleae captured log with analog enabled for high and low with working and non working case e2e.ti.com/.../Testing.zip</description></item></channel></rss>