This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TM4C129ENCPDT: Helping to select MCU for driving LCD

Genius 13979 points
Part Number: TM4C129ENCPDT

Hi Experts,

Seeking assistance on this query from Cx who is interested in getting an idea how support will work with TI should they select one of our microcontrollers for upgrading their legacy product. Below is their case:

Generally speaking, we're looking to integrate a decent size and resolution display, say in the 5 to 7 inch range, into an existing product previously based on a PIC18. The PIC controlled various analog circuitry and the updated product will continue to do so.  I've noticed on your website an Arm M4 family of processors, TM4C129xxxx.  I haven't drilled that deep yet, but six of these appear to have LCD controllers.  Are there other processor families that you would suggest as well?  For example, ST suggests a family of Arm M7 single and double core processors for display applications.

Aside from hardware, do you have your own suite of GUI design software or just suggest using a 3rd party like Crank or Embedded Wizard?

Lastly, what are your thoughts on the relative merits of using a smart display with it's own graphics engine on-board vs. fully integrating a raw display with the host MCU?

Thank you.

Regards,
Archie A.

  • Hi, 

      I can't speak for all TI MCU to have integrated LCD controller or not. For TM4C129 MCU, some of the part numbers do have the integrated LCD controller. The Tivaware SDK contains graphic library for application development. 

     It really depends on your application, performance and cost requirements when choosing a smart display with its own graphic engine vs raw display controlled by the host MCU.