• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 83 subscribers
  • Views 183 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320F28376D: Comparison of advantages

Rhea Gao
Expert 2340 points
Part Number: TMS320F28376D

Hi,

Some of my clients use F280666, F28027, F28066 and F280025. Now they want to change to F28376D. Is it difficult to transplant the software architecture changes?

Many thanks~

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 30180 points

    Hello Rhea,

    Are there specific peripherals that the clients are using on those devices that they're looking to migrate? It might help to narrow down the scope of what changes will be happening to their architecture.

    Best regards,

    Omer Amir

  • +1
    TI__Guru* 95315 points

    Rhea,

                  It is not possible to provide a simple answer. It is not just software, there are many other factors that need to be considered for migration. A few examples below:

    • Number of pins (package compatibility)
    • Operating voltage (1.8v Vs 1.2v)
    • Peripheral compatibility (Eg: F2806x has eCAN. Newer devices have DCAN. These modules are completely different from a software perspective)
    • Even common peripherals may have changes/ enhancements. 

    To get an idea, have the customer review some migration guides. They would give them an idea of the scope of changes while moving from one device to another.  Migration guide examples at www.ti.com/lit/SPRUIY3 & www.ti.com/lit/SPRACR0.

  • 0 in reply to Hareesh Janakiraman
    Expert 2340 points

    Hi Hareesh,

    Thanks for your support !