This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320F28069: ADC interrupt with PIEIER1 and PIEIER10

Part Number: TMS320F28069

Hello everyone,

My aim for the test is that CLA Task1 and ADC_ISR can be triggered by ADCINT1 at the same time. And then CLA Task1 complete will trigger CLA_ISR.

I am confused about PIEIER1 and PIEIRE10 in PieCtrlRegs.

In pie interrupt vector table, I found that ADCINT1 can assign to INT1.1 or INT10.1 in the picture below:

Using INT1.1 can achieve my aim, but replace to INT10.1 will go to ISR_ILLEGAL

The using code as following:

Workable condition:

EALLOW;

PieVectTable.ADCINT1 = &ADC_isr;

PieVectTable.CLA1_INT1 = &Cla1_isr1;

PieCtrlRegs.PIEIER1.bit.INTx1 = 1;      //ADCINT1

PieCtrlRegs.PIEIER11.bit.INTx1 = 1;    //CLA1_INT1

EDIS;

IER |= M_INT1;

IER |= M_INT11;

EINT;

ERTM;

Unworkable condition:

Replace the code as the following

PieCtrlRegs.PIEIER1.bit.INTx1 = 1;  =>  PieCtrlRegs.PIEIER10.bit.INTx1 = 1;

IER |= M_INT1;  =>  IER |= M_INT10;

( PieCtrlRegs.PIEACK in interrupt replace from 0x0001 to 0x0200 )

Other conditions are the same.

So what may cause to ISR_ILLEAGE. Is there anything I didn't notice?

Thanks.