This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320F280049C: Is there any difference when design ADC RC filter circuit between F280049 and F28335?

Part Number: TMS320F280049C

Hi Expert,

Is there any difference or anything to take care about ADC RC filter circuit designing when transfer from F28335 to F280049?

Thanks!

Best Regards/Rayna

  • Hi Rayna,

    The process is the same (see https://training.ti.com/node/1139106), but the input models for the two devices are different, so the designed circuits won't be the same.

    The nominal value of the external Cap is 20 x Ch, so the capacitor for F28004x will be around 10x larger than the cap in the F28335 circuit.

    Since F28335 ADC has a shorter minimum S+H time (because it samples faster), you would also generally need a higher bandwidth op-amp to drive F28335 vs. F28004x.

     

  • Hi Devin,

    Thanks for your reply. It's really clear to for the difference.

    My customer using F280049 to replace F28335, however they found the ADC gain error of F280049 is around (-10 ~ +10) comparing with F28335 (-2 ~ +2), with the external 3.3V ADC reference voltage.

    I send the schematic diagram and PCB layout to you offline, could you please help to review them?

    Thanks!

    Rayna

  • Hi Rayna,

    Sure, I will review the specific schematic and send feedback.

    Generally, note that the DS gain error specification of F28335 is +/- 30LSBs while F280049 is +/- 5 LSBs

    If the issue is that the voltage of the previous conversion result is affecting the current conversion result, this is a separate error from gain error, sometimes called "Memory Cross-talk".  This error should be close to 0 for properly designed signal conditioning circuitry.  Again, see the linked training from TI precision labs for guidance on how to design appropriate ADC driving circuits.