Hi Expert,
Is there any difference or anything to take care about ADC RC filter circuit designing when transfer from F28335 to F280049?
Thanks!
Best Regards/Rayna
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Expert,
Is there any difference or anything to take care about ADC RC filter circuit designing when transfer from F28335 to F280049?
Thanks!
Best Regards/Rayna
Hi Rayna,
The process is the same (see https://training.ti.com/node/1139106), but the input models for the two devices are different, so the designed circuits won't be the same.
The nominal value of the external Cap is 20 x Ch, so the capacitor for F28004x will be around 10x larger than the cap in the F28335 circuit.
Since F28335 ADC has a shorter minimum S+H time (because it samples faster), you would also generally need a higher bandwidth op-amp to drive F28335 vs. F28004x.
Hi Devin,
Thanks for your reply. It's really clear to for the difference.
My customer using F280049 to replace F28335, however they found the ADC gain error of F280049 is around (-10 ~ +10) comparing with F28335 (-2 ~ +2), with the external 3.3V ADC reference voltage.
I send the schematic diagram and PCB layout to you offline, could you please help to review them?
Thanks!
Rayna
Hi Rayna,
Sure, I will review the specific schematic and send feedback.
Generally, note that the DS gain error specification of F28335 is +/- 30LSBs while F280049 is +/- 5 LSBs
If the issue is that the voltage of the previous conversion result is affecting the current conversion result, this is a separate error from gain error, sometimes called "Memory Cross-talk". This error should be close to 0 for properly designed signal conditioning circuitry. Again, see the linked training from TI precision labs for guidance on how to design appropriate ADC driving circuits.