This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: TIDM-1019
1) Is this a good ADC capture at zero flow rate for following settings?
Transmit frequency :986 kHz
UPS0 to UPS1 gap :500 ms
Capture duration : 50us
Envelope threshold :20
2) I noticed that I always have some waves in the ADC waveform capture that are "attenuated".Is there something I can do to make it look cleaner?
1. The capture itself looks good, but I'd recommend starting the ADC capture sooner to center the waveform more. Try decreasing the ADC gap start value by about 3us.
2. Can you clarify where exactly in your capture you see the attenuation?
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Mitch Ridgeway:
Well i have marked the points with attenuation.
In reply to Divya Harikumar:
What you are seeing are artifacts of the sample rate you are using. This is normal and the capture itself looks good! If you wanted to clean up the signal, you can interpolate the data by exporting the capture data to a .csv file and importing it to Matlab. In Matlab, you can interpolate the signal.
I have a couple of questions
1)Which is a better ADC capture (A) or (B) and why?
2) It was suggested that i should reduce the ADC gap start .Is there any other importance of reducing gap between pulse start and ADC capture?
1. Your waveform is more centered in A, so I would say this capture is "better". Besides your ADC gap start parameter, are there any other parameters that are different between the two captures?
2. Reducing the gap between pulse start and ADC capture will center your capture more. This is important because as temperature varies, you will notice your capture will shift left or right, depending on if temperature increases or decreases. Centering your captures initially will help alleviate this effect.
There are a few parameter changes besides ADC gap start.
For, Waveform A: Capture duration = 60us , no:of pulses=30 and ADC gap start = 57us whereas
Waveform B: Capture duration = 50us , no:of pulses=25 and ADC gap start = 60us
Is waveform A still a better choice of ADC waveform?
Both waveforms are acceptable, but you might want to consider reducing the start gap for waveform B to 57us as well. This, along with the lower number of pulses, will give you a more centered reading along with lower power consumption. A more centered waveform will give you a more stable reading over a wider range of flow rates - as the waveform may shift as flow rate changes.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.