This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DRV8842: Data Sheet issues ?

Part Number: DRV8842
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRV8872,

Hi folks,

I have an in-house designed and built control board used to control some of our test equipment, it has 2 relays configured as a H bridge.  These relays have been wearing out and failing (50k+ ops) so I wanted to design a direct replacement using a solid state H bridge.  So I designed a replacement and built one test sample using a DRV8872.  It tested out ok but tripped as soon as I tried to use it for the end use case . . . it seems the current inrush due to the input capacitor of the device I was connecting it too was too great.

So back to the drawing board, this time with a DRV8842 which can control the output current,  "maximum current through the load is regulated by a fixed-frequency PWM current regulation,",  I've designed my circuit and laid out the PCB.

I've noticed a few anomalies in the data sheets, the version I have is a March 2016 revision, I think that is the latest.

  • Section 5. Pin Configuration and Functions:  CP1 CP2 says "Connect a 0.01-μF 50-V capacitor between CP1 and CP2."   Section 10.1 Layout guidelines says  "A low-ESR ceramic capacitor must be placed in between the CP1 and CP2 pins. TI recommends a value of 0.1 μF rated for VM ."  the diagram also shows 0.1uF
  • Section 8.2  Typical Application shows a 0.1uf cap between VM and VCP    V3P3OUT is grounded via a 0.47uF cap.  Section 10.1 Layout guidelines says   "A low-ESR ceramic capacitor must be placed in between the VM and VCP pins. TI recommends a value of 0.47 μF rated for 16 V."     and   "Bypass V3P3OUT to ground with a ceramic capacitor rated 6.3 V."  this is shown on the diagram as 0.1uF
  • Section 8.2.2.1  The example calculation for the resistor divider to set the VREF is incomplete  "Set R2 = 10 kΩ and set R1 = kΩ"   R1 does not have a value.

I know these anomalies are not very severe and easily worked around, I thought I would mention them so they might get fixed in a future revision.