Hi support team.
I think that ATQ_CALC and ATQ_CNT are reversed in the auto torque block diagram.
Is this correct?
Regards,
Higa
ATQ_CALC=ATQ_LRN+ATQ_CNT
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi support team.
I think that ATQ_CALC and ATQ_CNT are reversed in the auto torque block diagram.
Is this correct?
Regards,
Higa
ATQ_CALC=ATQ_LRN+ATQ_CNT
I think that ATQ_CALC and ATQ_CNT are reversed in the auto torque block diagram.
No, the block diagram is correct. The PID loop working to keep ATQ_CNT within ATQ_LL and ATQ_UL. When ATQ_CNT is too high due to motor load increased (higher than the programmed ATQ_UL), then the PID loop increases the motor current (full-scale current) to avoid motor missing step, and this causes lower ATQ_CNT. The chip generate ATQ_CNT based on motor BEMF vs. step input.
Regards,
Brian
Hi Brian-san
Thank you for confirming.
My understanding is that the value of ATQ_CNT is TQ_CALC added to ATQ_LRN in the block diagram below.
If I'm misunderstanding, does the block diagram below mean that the ATQ_CNT value is calculated as the difference between ATQ_LRN and ATQ_CALC?
The datasheet provides the following graph and equation.
I thought that the above block diagram and the following equation do not match.
I'm confused on how to understand it.
Regards,
Higa
Hi,
There is no conflicting of the block and equation and graph.
ATQ_CALC = ATQ_LRN + ATQ_CNT; and so
ATQ_CNT = ATQ_CALC - ATQ_LRN; which is shown on the block diagram.
If I'm misunderstanding, does the block diagram below mean that the ATQ_CNT value is calculated as the difference between ATQ_LRN and ATQ_CALC?
Yes, it is CALC - LRN.
Brian
Higa-san,
I agree with what Brian mentioned - there is nothing wrong with the block diagram. ATQ_CNT is ATQ_CALC minus ATQ_LRN.
Regards,
Dipankar
HI Brian-san Dipankar-san
Thank you for your advice.
I understood well.
Thanks.
Regards,
Higa