Part Number: DRV591
Hi team,
Could you please help to review the attached schematic design and help to confirm if customer can change L5204/L5205 from 10uH to 2.2uH?
will the change have impact to the performance or the output capacity?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: DRV591
Hi team,
Could you please help to review the attached schematic design and help to confirm if customer can change L5204/L5205 from 10uH to 2.2uH?
will the change have impact to the performance or the output capacity?
Hi Lilian,
LC filter on the output is to supress the ripple on the output current and EMI. So if lower value inductors are used for it, we need to evaluate it from these two perspectives.
The first, you need to know how much ripple current can be acceptable on the output. Higher ripple current reduces the actual temperature differential on TEC. On page 11 and 12 in the DRV591 datasheet, you could find how to calculate the ripple current from both frequency domain and time domain. For this calculation, you need to know how much VDD, TEC resistance and maximum ouput current are. Please calculate for the worse case(50% duty-cycle), and reserve enough margin for the design. Basically, the ripple current increases 4.55 times with changing 10uH inductors to 2.2uH in the same application.
To achieve a better EMI performance, please place the LC filter close to the output of DRV591 as much as possible. And it's very hard to evaluate the EMI performance degradation in a system, usually it's done by performing experiments. Because EMI performance is a system leve issue, and the result could be very different between the different systems. If your system is sensitive to EMI, please just keep 10uH inductors in your design.
Best regards,
Shawn Zheng