This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM5170: Suitability of LM5170 for precision constant current applications

Part Number: LM5170

We're currently evaluating the suitability of the LM5170 as a 2 or 4 phase buck only constant current power supply. I've noticed that the scope of the supporting design documention is very focused on battery applications which has made it difficult to determine it's suitability for a more "clean" supply to a load. The load is transient sensitive and will not tolerate overshoot of current beyond the set limit and will require a small ripple.

Here is quick summary of the application: HV-Port will accept a nominal 48V input, channels 1 & 2 configured for buck mode forming a unidirectional constant current supply for a 50A load on the LV-port, compliance voltage of approximately 24V. A microcontroller interface will be utilised for control and supervision of the LM5170 and feedback from the load.


The independent analog current control for channel 1 & 2 make this controller quite appealing at face value and greatly simplify constant current SMPS, but I'm having a difficult time determining how well suited it is as a more classical multiphase buck converter like the high current low voltage systems for processors as opposed to more tolerant, rugged loads like batteries.

I notice the datasheet does not include any calculation for determining Cout with respect to a target ripple, could someone assist with the multiphase equation? In addition, does external triggering of nFAULT trip the breaker feature?

  • Hello William,

    Thank you for considering LM5170.

    For the Cout calculation, there is no big difference for the multiphase. The steady state ripple will still be determined by the overall peak to peak current. And the load transient overshoot/undershoot can be estimated based on the equivalent inductor value. The details can be found in this application report https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva882b/slva882b.pdf section 5.5.

    Yes, if nFault is pulled low externally the the circuit breaker is turned off and stays shutdown latched.

    Thanks,

    Yinsong

  • Thanks Yinsong,

    A few more questions:

    * If ISETA is driven by a DAC or similar analog input does this set the current per channel or the total current output in a multiphased configuration?

    * Lets suppose there are two LM5170s in 4-phase topology, how does ISETA control the total output current, does the load balancing mean that the second controller will regulate to 1/2 ISETA? And all phases will regulate to 1/4 of the ISETA programmed value?

  • Hi William,

    1. ISETA sets one channel/phase.

    2. In 4-phase configuration with two LM5170s, the ISETA still sets one channel/phase. The current balancing of each phase is naturally guaranteed by connecting the ISETA of two LM5170s together. If it's running in current control only, the ISETA need to be set to 1/4 of the total current desired. If it's running in closed voltage loop, the voltage loop will auto-adjust the ISETA.

    Thanks,

    Yinsong