Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS61089, TPS62132, TPS62130, , TPS25947, TPS25940-Q1, TPS22810, TPS1H100-Q1, TPS1HC100-Q1, TPS1HB16-Q1, TPS1HB08-Q1
Hi Team,
We would like to ask your help regarding our customer's inquiry below.
Hello, in our prototype design, we are using your DC/DC converters (TPS62132, TPS62130,TPS61089). Obviously they are isolated from each other since they output different voltages, but they share the same source (which is the battery pack).
I am reading thru your "Basics of Power Switches" application report and I am interested on how to use your power switches to protect the input and output of the DC/DC converters.
For the input side, the report shows using an efuse. Could you please guide me in designing which efuse to use if I will use your 3 converters (they still share the same battery pack)? For example, will the current limit of each 3 efuses be the maximum battery pack current output?
For the output side, your report shows separately using a load switch and a high-side switch. While I understand the benefits of each power switch topology, I am still at a loss at picking the most comprehensive protection for my circuit. I am inclined to use 2 or more power switches together on a single line to get the protection I want. I have 2 combos I thought of:
- load switch and efuse, sequentially
- efuse and smart high-side switches, vice versa
Are these combos suitable? Were these power switches tested together in this manner by TI in the past? Were they viable for automotive applications?
The protection I am seeking is comprehensively covering all the functions found in Table 1 of the report. The circuit will be flown in a cube satellite therefore "extraordinary" protection is needed for my circuit.
Please advise and thank you for your patience and guidance.
Regards,
Danilo