This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS65186: damage case

Part Number: TPS65186
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65185

We have a board with TPS65186 on it. 

Before TPS65186 power on , the VCOM pin  have -100mV of Vlotage form other pcb circuit.

And than the TPS65186 is damaged。

Can you tell me -100mV of Vlotage on  VCOM pin before TPS65186 power on will damage the TPS65186  device?

Thank you!

  • Hi Guigao, thank you for reaching out. As this is a legacy device, our applications knowlege is limited. Per 7.1 of datasheet, Abs min voltage on VCOM pin is -20V, so -100mV should not damage the device, however any negative voltage will impact device performance. Can you conduct ABA board device swap to isolate the problem?

  • Hi Brandon,thank you for your replay. Per 7.1 of datasheet, Abs min voltage is VCOM_PWR,not VCOM.

    As VCOM is out pin, before device power up the -100mV is not allowed?

    This problem has appeared on several boards, so we want to clarify the cause。

  • Hi Guigao,

      I think it should be ok for VCOM pin with -100mV before device power up. I'll let the device expert answer you next week. 

    Thanks!

    Phil

  • Hi Guigao,

    1. How are you confirming the TPS65186 is damaged in this scenario?
    2. Does discharging the -100 mV at VCOM before power up prevent this damage?
    3. Can you explain the TPS65186 operating conditions when -100 mV is present at VCOM?
    4. In addition, what are the voltages at these pins?
    • VIN
    • VIN_P
    • WAKEUP
    • PWR_UP

    Thanks,

    Gerard

  • Hi Gerard

    1.How are you confirming the TPS65186 is damaged in this scenario?

    A:VPOS/VNEG does not have normal output and after replacing the chip the output is normal .


    2.Does discharging the -100 mV at VCOM before power up prevent this damage?

    A: We do not have the discharging circuit on the VCOM.  If  the -100mV is the cause of the damaged chip, we will avoid it.

    We want to know the reason.


    3.Can you explain the TPS65186 operating conditions when -100 mV is present at VCOM?

    A: At the beginning TPS65186  is not powered when -100 mV is present at VCOM.

      and then, +5V is powered with as the following circuit.


    4.In addition, what are the voltages at these pins?

    A:Before TPS65186  powered
     VIN :0V
     VIN_P:0V
     WAKEUP:0V
     PWR_UP:0V

    After TPS65186  powered
     VIN :+5V
     VIN_P:+5V
     WAKEUP:+3.3V
     PWR_UP:+3.3V

  • HI Guigao,

    Thanks for sharing the additional details. For (2) is it not possible to discharge with an external pull-down resistor?

    We are trying to understand if applying -100 mV at any time causes the damage, or it if is sequence related (for example, the damage only occurs if -100 mV present and input power is applied). A scope shot demonstrating VCOM, VIN, WAKEUP, PWR_UP would also be helpful for this. 

    Regarding the schematic:

    • Boost inductor (L1) should be 2.2 uH
    • Inverting Buck-Boost inductor (L2) should be 4.7 uH
    • A local 4.7 uF decoupling capacitor is recommended at the VCOM_PWR pin

    Is it possible to correct these and test if the issue still occurs?

    Thanks,

    Gerard

  • Hi Gerard

    Thank you for your suggestions and corrections to the schematic.

    Since the board has already been delivered to the customer, we can't test it right away.

    Can you tell me VCOM -100mV (minus voltage) input is the guaranteed operating range for TPS65186 or not ?

    Thank you!

  • Hi Guigao,

    Any voltage applied to the VCOM pin at any point would be unexpected operation of the device. The VCOM pin is an output pin intended to be controlled by the PMIC during normal operation. If this -100 mV cannot be avoided, you may consider evaluating the similar TPS65185 or TPS651851 - these devices have a VCOM discharge that may be able to pull the -100 mV down automatically. 

    Thanks,

    Gerard

  • Hi Gerard

    Are the following recognitions right?

    Any voltage applied to the VCOM pin at any point, It is not guaranteed that the chip can operate normally.

     *I think we can avoid  the -100 mV,so i want to resolve my issue.

  • Hi Guigao,

    Your understanding is correct.

    Thanks,

    Gerard