Hi Team,
Customer want to use LM5161-Q1 as Flyback, but the Webench tool only has Flybuck choice.
So customer wonder if we have Excel tool/ App note or other document to help them calculate the components?
Thank you!
Marc
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Team,
Customer want to use LM5161-Q1 as Flyback, but the Webench tool only has Flybuck choice.
So customer wonder if we have Excel tool/ App note or other document to help them calculate the components?
Thank you!
Marc
Hi Marc,
The Flyback and Fly-Buck topologies both provide isolation and the ability to generate multiple output rails from a single converter. Since we have more resources available for converting the LM5161-Q1 into the Fly-Buck topology this may be the easier route to choose.
The flyback topology is essentially derived from replacing the inductor of a buck-boost with a transformer while the Fly-Buck replaces the inductor of a buck with a transformer or coupled inductor. To convert the LM5161-Q1 to a flyback style, you'll configure the LM5161-Q1 as an inverting buck-boost then replace the inductor with a transformer.
This article does a nice job of explaining the distinction (it is still referred to as a Fly-Buck in this article):
This app note details how to configure a buck converter to an inverting buck-boost:
https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snva856a/snva856a.pdf
This app note details the Fly-Buck equations:
AN-2292 Designing an Isolated Buck (Fly-Buck) Converter (Rev. C) (ti.com)
Hopefully this helps.
Regards,
Harrison Overturf
Marc,
Although this isn't specifically for the LM5161-Q1, this calculator can be helpful for selecting the correct topology and components:
Regards,
Harrison Overturf
Hi Marc,
I haven't heard back from you for some time so assume this issue is resolved.
Feel free to post a reply if this is not the case.
Regards,
Harrison Overturf