This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMR38010: Power Consumption of LMR38010FDDAR

Part Number: LMR38010
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMR38020EVM

Hi,

I'm currently using the LMR38010FDDAR step-down converter.  Is it expected for the device to consume about 2/3 W without a load attached?  

Input voltage: 50 V DC

Output voltage: 3.3 V DC

Switching Frequency: Set to ~1.3 MHz (20k ohm resistor)

Inductor: 15 uH

 

With a 30 ohm load attached, power draw in total is a little larger than 1 W.  Similar results with a switching frequency set to about 400 KHz (less power consumed, but enough to still make the chip warm).

Best

  • Hello, 

    That power consumption sounds too high. 

    Do you have a schematic you can share? 

    Regards,

    Harrison Overturf 

  • Hi Harrison,

    I've inserted an image of the schematic.  

    Best

  • Hello,

    Thanks for sharing the schematic, I don't see any red flags. 

    Are you using an FPWM enabled part? 

    Are there other devices on the board that may be consuming current?

    Regards,

    Harrison Overturf 

  • Hi Harrison,

    This is device does have FPWM (does it switch automatically between that and PFM, or does this specific part number only support FPWM?).  

    For a test board, there are only three other components--they are used for input protection: resistor, diode, TVS diode.  Resistor is only consuming about 4.5 mW when 50 V is supplied.  Just going by heat produced, the 38010 is the component that generates significant heat, reaching 50 C on the package surface at room temperature (with load and without load).  

    Best

  • Hello,

    Have you tested this on multiple devices or is it just one device? If you have just seen it on one device can you try swapping that device for another. 

    Have you tested this device on the EVM and seen this occur? 

    Regards,

    Harrison Overturf 

  • Hi Harrison,

    I did use the LMR38020EVM board (but swapped out the 8020 for the 8010 and removed/added passives to match the above schematic, and it shows similar behavior.  The buck only heats to about 30 C on the eval board due to the much better heat sinking from what I can tell.  The numbers I have with the modified EVM board are 0.568 W no load @ 50 V input.  1.43 W with a 30 ohm load @ 50 V input.  Switching frequency set to about 1.3 MHz, 3.3 V output voltage.  

    I've tested two of our own boards total so far--one with just the power circuitry and one with additional electronics.  Same behavior.  

    I just purchased a second EVM which I wanted to test unchanged to get a baseline.  Should get it by Monday.  

    Best

  • Hello,

    Is the 0.568W in reference to the amount of power dissipated by the IC? For 50Vin, no load that would be around 11mA input current, is this what you're measuring? 

    Regards,

    Harrison Overturf 

  • Hi Harrison,

    That is correct, I measure between 11-13 mA on our pcb (just the buck converter and power protection components populated). 

    I just plugged in a new LMR38020EVM to a 50 V input.  No load is attached at the output and 5 V is measured.  The current @50 V is about 9.8 mA.  Is this expected?  

    Best

  • Hello,

    I generated a Webench design based on this situation and it appears that this input current is to be expected (I checked for the case of 50Vin, 3.3Vout / 5Vout, 110mA load, FPWM, 1MHz).

    Here is the link to the design for your review: Power Designer (ti.com) 

    Regards,

    Harrison Overturf 

  • Hi Harrison,

    I'm unable to see the design.  I get: 

    "

    Oops!

    Something went wrong

    Sorry, an error occured with our website and someone has been notified to take a look.
    "

    What is expected for a no load condition?  I measure about 9.8 mA without a load attached.  

    Best

  • Hello, 

    Looking at the efficiency curve in the datasheet and going down to 1mA of load current:

    for 5V out, 1mA load, 48V in FPWM mode the efficiency is ~1.x% to 2%. We can estimate the input current. 

    Assuming 1% efficiency in this condition...the input current would be (VOUT*IOUT)/(VIN*Efficiency)....which would be ~(5V*0.001A)/(50V*0.01)...so it looks like the input current will be in the 10mA range...

    So what you are describing looks like expected consumption in FPWM. Switching to PFM mode would help you save some of this input current. The tradeoff would be that the frequency will be lower/not constant at light load.

    Regards, 

    Denislav

  • Hi Denislav,

    Thanks for the reply.  Where does the 1 mA come from?  Is it consumed as part of the feedback?  

    PFM mode would mean a different version of the chip?

    Best

  • Hello, 

    The 1mA is the load in the plot above. It does not include the feedback current but in the plot above the feedback current is in micro-amps so it can be ignored for the estimate. 

    Yes, the PFM mode would be different "orderable" of the same chip. Here is the table (Table 5) from the datasheet. The FPWM options have an "F" in the orderable number:

    The different orderables are pin-to-pin. You can pick which combination you would fit in your application needs. If you need low consumption at "standby"/'light" load with reduced switching frequency the PFM mode of operation would be better. 

    Regards, 

    Denislav

  • Hi Denislav,

    Thanks.  

    The 9.8 mA @50 V was measured on an EVM board for the 8020, nothing attached to the output (Vout).  What would be responsible for that current draw?  I may be missing where that 1mA you mentioned is coming from.  

    Best

  • Hello, 

    At a high level, in FPWM the part operates in constant (full) switching frequency and there are switching losses in the power FETs. It takes current to turn the power MOSFETs on and off and the current is proportional to the switching frequency. 

    In PFM, the switching frequency reduces and the losses are lower as a result. 

    Regards, 
    Denislav

  • Hi Denislav,

    Sounds good, thanks!

    Best