• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 64 subscribers
  • Views 216 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS7H5003-SP: About the difference of the Active Clamp Flyback between UCC289* and TPS7H000*

Tak
Intellectual 480 points
Part Number: TPS7H5003-SP
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC2894, UCC2893, UCC28780

We'd like to adopt the flyback converter with PWM active clamp.

So far , we are used UCC2893 or UCC2894 . 

At happens , we found the TPS7H000*.

We can design active clamp flyback with this device , right ?

I want to know the difference between UCC2893 and TPS7H5003.

On the other hand , UCC28780 is superior to UCC2893 and TPS7H5003 as flyback.

Don't you think so ?

  • +1
    TI__Mastermind 26145 points

    Hey Tak,

    The TPS7H500X-SP devices are meant to be used in radiation environments for satellite applications.
    You are comparing it to commercial grade devices that are much less expensive.

    Can you confirm that your application is meant for a radiation hardened environment?

    Thanks,
    Daniel