Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CSD19502Q5B
Hi,
Do you have any evaluation board that fits the specification below: 22-30V DC to 19.5V DC up to 14-15A.
Kind regards,
Bright
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
Do you have any evaluation board that fits the specification below: 22-30V DC to 19.5V DC up to 14-15A.
Kind regards,
Bright
Hi Robert
sorry, unfortunately we do not have and EVM matching your spec right now.
But you may use this reference design as a starting point: (it is based on the EVM)
PMP21278 reference design | TI.com
Best regards,
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for your email.
I have used the WEBENCH® POWER DESIGNER to run a simulation based on
LM34936RHFR, similar to the LM34936EVM. I have attached the results. Is this efficient to design to 22-30V DC to 19.5V DC, 14A. or is the PMP21278 reference design a more better option?
Kind regards,
Bright
Hi Bright,
both look OK for me - so using the Webench design might be easiest.
Best regards,
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for the email.
Considering the simulation form Webench that I sent regarding LM34936RHFR, can use only one MOSFET per each 4 switch - part number CSD19502Q5B? The PMP21278 reference design used 2 MOSFET each for the 4 switches. What are the pro and cons of using two MOSFETs in parallel for each of the 4 switches?
Kind regards,
Bright
HI Bright,
with 2 MOSFETs in parallel you will get:
- lower R_DS,on (as divided by 2) therefore lower on losses.
- have a better thermal spreading due to larger area
- will have higher switching losses as you have to switch 2 gate charges.
So it will end up in the defining the thermal performance of the circuit, heat dissipation, thermal spreading and cooling.
Best regards,
Stefan