This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM5001-Q1: DCDC Converter selection

Part Number: LM5001-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5122, LM51770

Tool/software:

Hi, 
I am looking for a DCDC buck/boost converter that can take in 3.6V and output 36V. I found this one, the LM5001-Q1, but it can only output 1A, and I need it to be able to provide 5A at a peak current option to my device as well. I am planning on using batteries that provide 3.6V and up to 30A to then convert to 36V with a peak of 5A. 
I have had a hard time narrowing these output specs on the filter. Please let me know if there are any suitable options.
Thank you,
Monique
  • Hello Monique,

    Thanks for using the e2e forum.
    3.6V to 36V is a boost factor of x10, so it might exceed the duty cycle capabilities of a simple boost controller.
    An alternative option would be use of a flyback topology, which allows buck and boost and can support higher boost ratios by adjusting the winding ratio.
    However, this topology is commonly not used for more than 100W power. As you application needs 180W peak power, you may see high losses due to the voltage drop on the output diode.
    Here another option would be using the boost controller stages.

    Is 5A load only required for a short time, or is this the common operation that needs to supported over longer timespans?

    Thanks and best regards,
    Niklas

  • Hi Niklas,

    5A is the peak current, and would not be sustained. It would likely be about 3A sustained for around 8 minutes, and I plan to characterize this better. I would be interested in how to implement the flyback and boost controller stages; what would the differences be between those and the benefits of each one?

    Thanks,

    Monique

  • Hi Monique,

    Thanks for the feedback.
    Allow me to check if I find a suitable reference design. I will get back to you tomorrow.

    Best regards,
    Niklas

  • Hi Monique,

    Sorry for the long delay.
    Unfortunately, I was not able to find a reference design including both boost stages or a flyback of this size.
    In fact, there where some additional problem I encountered with these parameters.
    With 3.6V input voltage, most of our controller will not turn on, as the require a higher voltage for startup.
    LM5123 might be the closes device, which can start up with 3.8V minimum supply.

    There are workarounds for starting up with low supply voltage.
    This reference design uses an additional start-up circuit and can turn on with just 1V supply voltage.
    https://www.ti.com/tool/PMP31011
    However, the application might get a bit expensive this way, as you would require two boost stages and a start-up circuit.

    You mentioned you will use 3.6V batteries for the supply.
    One consideration would be to use two batteries in series, to create 7.2V.
    With this supply, you can achieve 36V with just one power stage and no start-up circuit would be required.
    This would safe cost and you can use one LM5122 or LM5123 device.
    Would this be a possibility?

    Best regards,
    Niklas

  • Hi Niklas, 

    I was actually looking at the LM51770 using 3.6, and it seems to do okay? However, the excel sheet and the online power designer give very different values for the inductor. Would that be a possibility?
    Using 7.2V, I am going to test with the LM5123 as well.

    Thanks,

    Monique

  • Hi Monique,

    LM5177x would be suitable as well, I agree.
    It is possible that you receive different recommendations on inductance by different calculators.
    This comes from the fact that inductor current ripple and component size is a trade-off and the load at which the regulator switches between DCM (discontinues conduction mode during light loads) and CCM (continuous conduction mode) depends on design preference.

    Essentially both calculation tool recommendations should lead to solid designs, but if the values vary a lot between calculators, I would recommend to go with the quickstart calculator, as this tool takes more inputs from the user.

    Best regards,
    Niklas

  • Thank you!

    For the LM5123, I was using the Eval Board and substitued the components for the ones in the quickstart spreadsheet I used. Below is the BOM for the replacements. Could you take a look? When I turned it on, something smoked, so something is wrong, but I am not sure what...

    L 4.7 uH 784373170047 Würth Elektronik L1
    Cout 500 uC PCV1H470MCL1GS Nichicon remove 3 150uC, add 50uC
    Rs 4 mOhms KRL6432E-M-R004-F-T1 Susumu R2/R3, replace one and remove the other
    RUVT 0 solder bridge
    RUVB 0 R21/C37
    RREFT 12 kOhms ERA-3AEB123V Panasonic Electronic Components R24
    RREFB 18 kOhms CRCW060318K0FKEAC Vishay Dale R26
    Ccomp 3 nF GRM1885C1H332JA01D Murata Electronics C42
    Rcomp 140 kOhms RC0603FR-07140KL YAGEO R23
    CHF 40 pF C0603C390J5GACTU KEMET C43
    CSS 220 nF GCM188R71H224KA64D Murata Electronics C38
  • Hi Monique,

    Thanks for the update.
    The component ratings all look okay to me.

    Did you make measurements of the switch node during operation?
    If the switching is unstable, you may have chosen a compensation that is not stable.
    In this case I would recommend to choose a slower compensation and check if the system stabilizes.
    You can also attach the quickstart spreadsheet you have filled in and I will double check the entries.

    Best regards,
    Niklas

  • Hi! I realized I accidentally had a jumper connecting Vcc and Vin, and I think that was the cause. Why would someone want to connect those pins? I am also assuming my 7.2V input would cause the Vcc pin to overload and break the chip and potentially the Fets

    Thanks,

    Monique

  • Hi Monique,

    I am glad to hear you found the problem yourself.
    Is the design working now, or do you need additional help?

    Best regards,
    Niklas

  • Hi,

    it did not work, and I was going to use spice to see what could have been incorrect. I imported the PSpice model into LTSpice, but got an error. Do you have an unencrypted PSPICE or encrypted LTSpice model I could use?

    Thanks,

    Monique

  • Hi Monique,

    The engineer is out of office today. Please expect a delayed reply.

    Best Regards,
    Feng

  • Hi Monique,

    The PSpice model of LM5123 is encrypted, so it cannot be transferred to LTSpice.
    We have an unencrypted model available, which can be shared under NDA restrictions.
    This file can then be transferred to LTSpice.

    Do you know if your company has an active NDA contract with Texas Instruments?
    If yes, could you share this file with me via direct messaging?
    I can then prepare the unencrypted files and send them to you.

    Sorry for the additional inconvenience.

    Best regards,
    Niklas