This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS53353: Design review

Part Number: TPS53353


I am designing a 12 V → 5 V, 10 A buck power supply using only ceramic output capacitance and the TPS53353 family (or an equivalent DC-DC with ripple-injection). Key requirements and design choices:

  • Vin: 12 V

  • Vout: 5 V

  • Iout (max): 10 A

  • Soft-start: 2.8 ms

  • Mode: Forced conduction / FCCM

  • Switching frequency: 400 kHz

  • Inductor: 2.2 µH, 8.6 mohm, 20% tolerance

  • R_trip (RT resistor): 75 kohm

  • Output capacitors: five × 100 µF ceramic capacitors (parallel), no polymer or electrolytic capacitors

When I use the Excel tool (which uses the polymer-capacitor stability formulae copied from the design section of the datasheet), the calculated ESR_Min (for stability) is greater than ESR_Max and the sheet flags a red warning. The spreadsheet’s stability criterion and the ESR bounds appear to be based on polymer capacitor ESR models.

My question: Can I safely ignore this warning because I am using only ceramic capacitors (very low ESR) and I am implementing the ripple-injection topology recommended in the datasheet.

I have attached the Excel sheet used for the calculations. 10A 12V-5V.xlsx