This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS61094: TPS61094 charge voltage limitation (2.7V vs 3.6V) for Li-SOCl₂ + LIC1020 (80F) in NB-IoT smart meter – which setting is recommended?

Part Number: TPS61094

Hello TI Team,

We are designing a battery-powered smart water meter using NB-IoT communication, with a target lifetime of ~10 years.


System details

  • Battery: 3.6V, 19Ah Li-SOCl₂ (primary lithium)

  • Supercapacitor: LIC1020, 80F, 3.8V rated

  • Regulator: TPS61094

  • Output voltage: 3.3V

  • Load profile:

    • Sleep current: ~45 µA

    • Active current: ~70 mA

    • Peak current: ~330 mA (NB-IoT TX, ~1 sec/day)


Challenge

We observed that TPS61094 supports discrete charge termination voltages, and there are no selectable values between 2.7V and 3.6V.

This leaves us with only two practical options:

  • 2.7V

  • 3.6V


Concern

  1. If we select 3.6V:

    • Charging will only occur when battery voltage is near full (~3.6V)

    • Once battery drops below ~3.3–3.4V, the LIC will no longer charge

    • This may lead to loss of supercap buffering during mid/end-of-life

  2. If we select 2.7V:

    • Charging will work across most of the battery discharge curve

    • However, stored energy in the LIC is significantly reduced (~50% compared to 3.6V)

    • This may impact NB-IoT pulse performance and efficiency


Questions

  1. For a Li-SOCl₂ + NB-IoT pulse load application, which charge voltage would TI recommend:

    • 2.7V (lower energy, full-life operation)

    • 3.6V (higher energy, limited charging window)

  2. Does TI have any guidelines or reference designs for selecting supercap charge voltage in long-life metering applications?

  3. Is it acceptable to operate the LIC continuously at 2.7V from a performance and lifetime perspective?

  4. Would TI recommend an alternative device (within TI portfolio) that allows:

    • More flexible charge voltage (e.g., 3.0–3.3V range)

    • While still supporting ultra-low quiescent current and supercap charging?

  5. Does TI recommend any alternative supercapacitor / LIC / HLC devices or a different power architecture (e.g., passive buffering, different regulator topology, or hybrid approach) that would be better suited for:

    • Li-SOCl₂ battery

    • NB-IoT pulse load

    • 10-year lifetime requirement?


Goal

Our objective is to:

  • Ensure reliable NB-IoT operation across full battery life

  • Maximize usable battery capacity

  • Avoid mid-life degradation of supercap functionality


Looking forward to your recommendation.

Thank you.

 
 
 
  • Hi,

    I apologize that currently only the TPS61094 product may meet your requirements. Based on your description, I recommend setting the charging voltage to 2.7V.

    Regarding product lifespan. Yes, TI guarantees the lifespan of the chip within the specified operating range, but the actual lifespan ultimately depends on your specific operating conditions: such as temperature, current, and so on.

    There are currently no plans for a next-generation product for the 61094. Hope you can understand. Thanks

    Aurora