This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ41Z90: BQ41Z90 - Power MOSFETs arrangement

Part Number: BQ41Z90

Hello,

In my design, using the BQ41Z90, I'm thinking about the power MOSFETs arrangement.

Architecture wise, the charge and discharge MOSFETs will be placed in series; hence, we'll have a single charge/discharge line. 

Now, I'm evaluating the possibility to put the MOSFETs in a front-to-front manner (common drain) instead of a more standard back-to-back arrangement.

From the BQ41Z90 point of view, is there any limitation to that? Is the MOSFETs control still feasible and efficient if I use the front-to front configuration? 

I also see that in the Evaluation Board the MOSFETs are placed front-to-front on the series line, so I guess it is feasible indeed...but I'd like to know if there's any known limitation or disadvantage.

 

Thanks in advance,

Davide

  • Hello,

    This question has been assigned within the team and will be reviewed and followed up with another application engineer when possible. In the meantime please attach any associated .log/.gg files associated with the projects

    Thank you,
    Alan 

  • Hello, 

    I do not see any obvious disadvantages to this other then the physical difference of having 2 power paths (one for charging and one for discharging) as opposed to just a shared power path for charging and discharging. Ultimately, I recommend to follow the schematic of the EVM. 

    Regards, 

    Jonny. 

  • Hello Jonny, 

    Thanks for your answier.

    WIth the drain to drain configuration we would still have a single power path; anyway good to know that are not particular disadvantage.

    Thanks again!

    Davide