This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS61010 efficiency problem

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS61010

Dear E2E,

we are evaluating the TPS61010 boost converter using SLVP157 evaluation board. The target use case is tested by simulating a constant load with 30 Ohms and simulating a single primary AA alkaline cell input voltage with a laboratory power supply unit (0.8V...1.6V). All measurements are taken by Fluke/Agilent multimeters. Unfortunately, the device seems to have some type of effciency fall-off at a battery voltage of approximatly 1.3V (see test data in second text box). What is the reason for this effect and how can it avoided?


Modifications on EVM:
L1 replaced with Wuerth 74477710, C2 replaced with 100pF, C0G.

Some attempts we made, trying to fix this efficiency problem:

1.) Compensation network; varying C2 (47pF...150pF) as mentioned in datasheet affects efficiency in all test points. 100pF brings the best results.

2.) Other inductors; Wuerth 744053100 -> less efficiency in all test points, Wuerth PD series with 22uH -> the efficiency notch seems to occur at a lower input voltage (~1.2V) => Is here some kind of resonance including the inductor that acivates the anti-ringing circuit of the TPS61010?

The current into L1 (at SW pin) was measured using a current probe/scope. The TPS61010 operates in continues mode all the time and the points of lower efficiency seems to occur if a duty-cycle of 50% is reached. Having some kind of hysteresis, the lower effiency (=higher input current) points can be found at fixed, repeatable voltages, when decreasing or increasing input voltage.

Best regards
Gunnar

  • I would not recommend this older device for new designs. We have many newer parts that offer better efficiency and smaller solution size.  You can find them with the power quick search at power.ti.com.  If that does not work for you, you can post your power requirements here.