On the BQ29411 secondary overvolt protection IC and the BQ34Z950 gas gauge ICs, V1 is the cell at the top of the stack, and V4/V5 is the cell at the bottom of the stack.
Why did TI not follow this convention when designing the BQ294512 device (replacement for the BQ29411)? The new device has V1 as the bottom-most cell in the stack.
Nothing like cutting traces adding wires to a 50-piece prototype run of boards.