This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS61194: TPS61194 FAULT pin operation

Part Number: TPS61194


I am validating backlight driver performance in regards to a short on the output and it is not behaving as expected.  The test case assumes the positive output (VOUT) is shorted to the negative output (OUT1-4).

 

What we expect:

1)      We short VOUT to OUT1-4.

2)      OUT1-4 voltage begins to rise to VOUT level.

3)      A Shorted LED FAULT is triggered.

4)      Backlight driver recovers once EN pin is toggled.

 

What we see:

1)      We short VOUT to OUT1-4.

2)      OUT1-4 begins to rise to VOUT level.

3)      FAULT pin is NOT triggered and OUT1-4 rises fully to VOUT.

4)      VOUT and OUT1-4 decay to VIN levels (Switching stops).

5)      Backlight driver recovers once EN pin is toggled.

 

The datasheet describes a shorted LED fault as:

“Detected if the voltage of one or more current sinks is above shorted string detection level and at least one OUTx voltage is within headroom window.”

 

In our case, we only have 1 LED string so there is no “voltage within headroom window”.  I do not see any description for this scenario so are you able to shed some light on it?  Our main concern is that the fault pin is not triggering, which makes us worry that the backlight driver does not see this as a failed state.

-Dave

  • Hello Dave,

    Thank you for the detailed description. To detect LED short, TPS61194 requires that at least one channel be in good operational state i.e. voltage on at least one channel's OUTx pin be between low and mid comparator level. So, unfortunately,with a single LED string, part will not detect LED short condition and hence will not report it via FAULT signal.

    Regards,

    Liaqat

  • So... let me ask this; would the LP8861 have done this?  I am requesting datasheet access but don't have it yet; but the 'bullet' items call out OCP as a difference vs the TPS61194; would that part actually have detected this as a fault; or another in the family possibly?

  • Unfortunately, none of the current parts in the family will detect the situation you described as a fault (including LP8861).

    Regards,
    Liaqat