Because of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S., TI E2E™ design support forum responses may be delayed from November 25 through December 2. Thank you for your patience.

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS2105: Consultation on Problems in Material Use

Part Number: TPS2105
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM66100, TPS2115A

Now we use TPS2105, two-way power switch, one is battery power supply, the other is 3.3V power supply. When the battery power supply is small, the current of 3.3V power supply is 50mA. When 3.3V is electrified, it is always enabled. When 3.3V is electrified, MCU3.3V is supplied by 3.3V. When 3.3V is not available, it is supplied by battery power. Now it is found that in the process of switching, MCU3.3V is pulled down and the single chip reset. The timing of power on this chip can't be controlled. Help me to see if I can solve the reset problem. If it can't be solved, please help recommend the appropriate chip.

  • Hi Piero,

    Thanks for reaching out on E2E!

    I am unable to see the image you provided, can you reattach? It would help if you could attach a schematic of the application.

    Can you elaborate on what "electrified" means? To my understanding, it sounds like you're having an issue with the timing of the chip, is that correct?

    Thanks,
    Arthur Huang
  • "electrified" is just mean 3.3V  is in power supply at this time, Because   3.3V is not available sometimes .  and Can you see the picture now?

  • Hi Piero, 

    What is your load current? To my understanding, you're saying that the output is pulled to 0V when switching between IN1 and IN2, is that correct? How do you know that the device is resetting? 

    If you're looking for another device for simple battery ORing, I recommend looking at the LM66100 or the TPS2115A. 

    Thanks,

    Arthur Huang

  • Hi Piero,

    I haven't heard back from you in a bit, have you been able to resolve the issue?

    Thanks,
    Arthur