Because of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S., TI E2E™ design support forum responses may be delayed from November 25 through December 2. Thank you for your patience.

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

WEBENCH® Tools/TPSM53603: TPSM53603 Simulation models

Part Number: TPSM53603
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMZM33603

Tool/software: WEBENCH® Design Tools

Hi TI team!

I know TPSM53603 simulation models are not available. Now I'm confused for 28V to 3.3V/3A,Which one i should use TPSM53603 or LMZM33603. Can i got simulation models of TPSM53603. I know w.r.t. size TPSM53603 is better. Please guide me with respect to EMI which one is better LMZM33603 or TPSM53603 because LMZM33603 is operating at low frequency than TPSM53603.So I think LMZM33603 is better w.r.t. EMI. Please guide me.

Thanks and regards

  • Hi Ahsan,

    If we were to compare the TPSM53603 (Figure 48) radiated EMI with the LMZM33603 (Figure 43) radiated EMI, the assumption that the LMZM33603 has better EMI performance than the TPSM53603 can be made since as you pointed out the LMZM33603 is operating at a lower frequency. 

    There is no way to simulate EMI other than to base the assertion on the datasheet specifications. These radiated EMI result are from the actual standard EVM and tested at a local EMI chamber for accuracy.

    For thermals and size, I would suggest using the TPSM53603. You can also put a LDO at the end of the TPSM53603 to provide a clean output voltage with low noise.

    Here is an app note for reference. 

    Regards,

    Jimmy 

  • Thank you Jimmy for your reply. But can I access any simulation models of TPSM53603?

    Thanks and regards

  • There may be some work being done on the TPSM53603 device on WEBENCH designer to accurately match the datasheet component selection recommendation.

    This may be the reason why you are not able to simulate on WEBENCH designer right now. 

    I would give this some time for the internal WEBENCH team to fix. It should be back up soon for simulation purposes.

    Regards,

    Jimmy 

  • Hi Ahsan,

    I haven't heard back from the team yet. I have pinged the again to get a status update on this. If I get any more information,  I'll let you know.

    Regards,

    Jimmy 

  • Hi Ahsan,

    The simulation tool is still in progress and there may be some delay due to the current situation we have. In the mean time I would suggest getting an EVM to test out your use case condition in the lab.

    Regards,

    Jimmy