• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 63 subscribers
  • Views 144 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS2373: PMP20859 .bt change to .at

Kuan Wei Chen (Kevin Chen)
Genius 9710 points
Part Number: TPS2373
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2378, TPS2372, PMP20859

Dear Team,

Below redundant PD is for .bt, if I want to implement .at version just change the TPS2372 to TPS2378, right?

Or you have better total solution or reference design with .at two port redundant?

BR

Kevin

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 21320 points

    Hello Kevin,

    This design is redundant, hitless and smooth transition. Features such as Auto-MPS and the PG pin make hitless and smooth transition possible. If you are wanting those features at a lower power level, I would suggest changing the DC-DC design since the TPS2372 is the PD controller only. 

    The other challenge is the PMP20859 only has one PD power the DCDC at a time, and this is done with the PG pin. The PG pin is not on the TPS2378, so a new control method will have to be designed, and it does not appear to be straight forward with the TPS2378. 

    Overall I suggest just redesigning the DC-DC for a lower power stage. 

    If this post answers your question, please indicate so by marking this thread as resolved. Thank you.

     

    Regards, 

     

    Michael P.

    Applications Engineer

    Texas Instruments