This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS65150-Q1: Charge pump design option

Part Number: TPS65150-Q1

H I need these rails

AVDD    11.6V @150mA max

VGH      22.0V @ 0.6mA max

VGL       -9.0V @ 0.6mA max

 

 

I have a question though: VGL and VGH are generated by charge-pump networks from the ‘VSUP’ supply rail (11.6V in our case).

The datasheet examples typically show 1 charge-pump stage, but this won’t give much voltage headroom.

 

e.g. For VGH: 2x 11.6V = 23.2V, but after allowing for 2 schottky diode drops = 22.4V max (needs to be regulated at 22.0V).

e.g. For VGL: Inverted 11.6V = -11.6V, but after allowing for 2 schottky diode drops = -10.8V max (needs to be regulated at -9.0V).

 

I think I’ll need to use 2 charge pump stages for both VGL and VGH, to provide decent headroom for proper regulation:

For VGH: 2 stages = 3x 11.6V = 34.8V, but after allowing for 4 schottky diode drops = 33.2V max (regulated to 22.0V)

For VGL: 2 stages = -2x 11.6V = -23.2V, but after allowing for 4 schottky diode drops = -21.6V max (regulated to -9.0V)

 

would you agree?

  • Hello,

    You should be able to use a single stage charge pump for each if you use low forward drop schottky diodes, especially since the current is low at 0.6mA. You could design your board with two stages but provide options to bypass second stage. Once the boards are back, test it out to see if second stage is needed to achieve target regulated voltage.

    Kind Regards,

    Liaqat