https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/<p style="display:none;">blank</p>en-USTelligent Community 13https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1696601/tpsm86837-mpm3650-replacement/6536342Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:19:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c9b0d913-5a30-4e26-a34d-0ffef186787fSean Liao (Yu-Sheng)Hi Haseen, Vout max 5V, Iout 6A.https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1696699/lm5137f-q1-sm20-abist-pin-checker/6536323Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:04:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:7a6693e9-dacd-4954-941e-b8f365b3c2b1Link HuangHi Manvi, Do you have any progress? Thanks~! BR, Linkhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1697048/tps650366-q1-mission-profile-tailoringWed, 11 Nov 2026 14:02:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:128ad6af-0a0c-4499-a0d3-917747ee0393Link HuangPart Number: TPS650366-Q1 Hi Team, Hope all is well. My customer is Hirain, and they are using Derby at VW project. May you help to check this? In the FMEDA document, the profile in the Mission Profile Tailoring sheet only has three temperature spectra, while the mission profile provided by the OEM, as shown in the image below, has 11 temperature ranges. How should we modify it accordingly? OEM input: BR, LinkTPS650366-Q1Body Electronics &amp; Lightinghttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1697045/tps24710-inquiry-regarding-a-ti-alternative-for-the-ltc4234Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:00:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2c75f6f0-0089-4a1d-859d-4842b9532313JH ShinPart Number: TPS24710 Hello, My customer is looking for a TI alternative to the ADI LTC4234. Could you please recommend the most suitable TI hot swap controller to replace the ADI LTC4234? Thank you. JHTPS24710https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1695275/tps65930-requesting-for-efficency-calculator-and-thermal-estimator/6536302Wed, 11 Nov 2026 13:44:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1d6cdaf4-3080-4ce9-88d8-62951c642c5aAtchaya RamkumarHi Katie, No, I couldn&#39;t find the required tool for my part, TPS6593Q1 . Could you please confirm if there is another series that I can use for this part? or could you please share the appropriate tool for this specific part number? Thanks!https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1697033/am62a3-am62ax-processor-sdk-linux-build-failure-during-repository-cloningWed, 11 Nov 2026 13:15:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a8e86689-578d-48b1-9911-20106e73831fKoki TamaiPart Number: AM62A3 Hi, We are experiencing an issue while setting up the Processor SDK Linux environment for AM62Ax. We followed the build instructions on the following page: https://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-linux/esd/AM62AX/11_01_07_05/exports/docs/linux/Overview_Building_the_SDK.html The setup was executed with the following command: ./oe-layertool-setup.sh -f configs/processor-sdk-analytics/processor-sdk-analytics-11.02.02-config.txt /home/developer/work/tisdk During the repository cloning/fetching process, the Git server returns an error and the SDK environment setup cannot be completed. The same environment could be built successfully around February to April 2026, but it is now failing. Could you please advise whether there have been any changes to the repositories, branches, commits, access settings, or configuration files used by this SDK release? We would also appreciate guidance on the recommended workaround or updated configuration required to complete the build. The complete console output will be provided as an attached text file. am62ax_sdk_setup_error_log.txt Best regards, KokiIndustrial AutomationAM62A3https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1694196/lm74800evm-cd-optm-request-for-schematic-review-lm74800-q1-input-protection-circuit/6536276Wed, 11 Nov 2026 13:00:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4bff2df4-4367-4fde-84ac-f5a446c9361eDinesh Ram CHi Shiven, Thank you very much for your helpful feedback and support. We are proceeding with the implementation based on your comments. We have one urgent update regarding component sourcing. Our PCB is currently in the fabrication stage and assembly is scheduled for next week. We had noticed on DigiKey that stock for the LM74800QDRRRQ1 was expected to arrive by November 5th, but it has not been updated yet. It also currently appears out of stock on the TI website . Could you please let us know the current lead time for this part, or recommend any authorized buying options where stock might be immediately available? If the lead time is extended, could you kindly suggest a pin-to-pin compatible drop-in replacement from TI that we can use for next week&#39;s assembly without needing any schematic or layout changes? Thank you in advance for your guidance and support.https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1695730/tps54336a-chosing-an-appropriate-buck-boost-replacement/6536275Wed, 11 Nov 2026 13:00:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c451b012-e8bd-4d48-8156-8402cef1b507David PfaltzgraffAs stated in the original question - buck-boost. Boost from 5V to 8V, buck from 20 to 8V and smooth transitions as the input may change.https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1691389/ucc28600-q1-no-output/6536272Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:59:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:0160b34c-19e8-4848-a502-e4e4509cc889Govind RaiHi, My mail : g-rai@ti.com regards, Govindhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1692942/ucc28950-current-oscillation-and-outc-pulse-width-variation-near-a-specific-phase-shift-condition/6536268Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:57:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b0596a50-9e69-464a-8602-6f3cf9f05832Koki TamaiHi Anil, We have a meeting with the end customer tomorrow to discuss potential solutions, so it would be a great help if you could provide your current perspective by the end of today. Best regards, Kokihttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1697031/bq79735-q1-bq79735-q1-voltage-measurement-interference-between-multiple-gpio-channels-when-enabled-sequentiallyWed, 11 Nov 2026 12:57:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6b157e8e-d554-4666-9a9e-a79d3b5a1026Dhanush RPart Number: BQ79735-Q1 Hi TI Support Team, We are using the BQ79735-Q1 for HV voltage monitoring in an automotive BMS application. Hardware Configuration: GPIO1 to GPIO10 (V1_GPIO1 to V10_GPIO10) are connected to different HV sensing points through external resistor divider networks. These sensing points monitor various HV nodes, including before contactor, after contactor, after fuse, etc. Issue Observed: When only one GPIO channel is enabled for voltage measurement, the calculated divider voltage and the physically measured voltage are matching as expected. However, when multiple GPIO channels are enabled sequentially, enabling subsequent channels affects the voltage readings of previously enabled channels. This variation is observed both in the actual physical voltage measurements and in the BQ79735-Q1 reported readings. Technical Support Required: Are there any specific GPIO pull-up/pull-down configurations that need to be enabled or disabled for voltage sensing applications? Are there any internal pull-up/pull-down paths or GPIO configuration requirements that could influence the external voltage divider network? Kindly review this behavior and suggest the recommended action items ASAP. FYI, Designed for 800V system. Thank you for your support. Regards, Dhanush.HybridBQ79735-Q1electric &amp; powertrain systemshttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1696960/tps543021-remove/6536264Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:54:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a6525c35-9cb3-4d40-b8e3-7beea3f9b23eJagadeesh EgalaI dont think we can delete it completely. you can close it by selecting &quot; &quot;This resolved my issue&quot;.https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1696960/tps543021-remove/6536258Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:46:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:661101a5-d736-4457-8e01-62389f9acbf5AHiI&#39;m trying to find how to delete this ticket completely, it was never meant to go public... The ticket is resolved when ticket is deleted.https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1696895/lm5155-lm5155-ss-pin-final-voltage-and-min-max-limits/6536250Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:40:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:047166f6-3c6f-4127-97e0-fb51b9694b53Koki TamaiHi Stefan, Thank you for your clarification. Just to confirm, we understand that 3.8 V is the absolute maximum rating of the SS pin itself. Should we also use 3.8 V as the worst-case SS pin voltage when selecting the PNP transistor’s reverse base-emitter voltage rating (VEBO)? In other words, if the COMP voltage decreases to approximately 0 V, should we assume that a reverse B-E voltage of up to approximately 3.8 V may be applied to the PNP transistor? Best regards, Kokihttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1697027/lm5012-q1-lm5012-q1-operation-below-6v-vin-and-automotive-load-dump-protectionWed, 11 Nov 2026 12:37:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:7b5f8ee8-bdfc-40ca-984b-c78568c6bb82Murat SayılıPart Number: LM5012-Q1 Dear TI Engineering Support, We are developing a compact automotive telematics device using a single-PCB design. Our power requirements are: Input: 6–90 V DC continuous Output: 5 V, approximately 0.67 A nominal and up to 1.1 A with battery charging Reverse-polarity protection required Unsuppressed automotive load-dump transients up to approximately 202 V are under evaluation Ambient temperature: up to +85&#176;C We are evaluating the LM5012-Q1 in a compact buck converter topology. We would appreciate clarification on the following technical questions: Is startup and continuous operation at VIN = 5.0–5.5 V supported or guaranteed over temperature and process variation? What are the guaranteed minimum VIN, internal UVLO and VCC regulator dropout limits? Can the LM5012-Q1 regulate 5 V at VIN = 5.5 V and IOUT = 0.67 A? What output voltage can be expected at 1.1 A? Does TI recommend a low-loss reverse-polarity protection solution for a connector voltage as low as 6 V? For 90 V continuous input and unsuppressed load-dump transients up to approximately 202 V, can TI recommend a suitable automotive-qualified protection circuit or an alternative integrated buck converter? We are aiming for minimum component count and PCB area without compromising electrical safety or reliability. Please clarify which operating conditions are guaranteed by the datasheet and which would require additional validation. Thank you for your technical support. Best regards,LM5012-Q1Body Electronics &amp; Lightinghttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1688823/bq25892-investigation-and-recovery-of-unexpected-battery-unstable-state-issues/6536244Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:36:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1c64ec60-c28a-400d-859d-46901fbf13f3Akash LDear Sam, Please find the attached document containing the waveform captures. We observed approximately 1.5 V on the PG pin when the device enters the hanging state. e2e.ti.com/.../BQ25892_5F00_Waveforms.xlsx Regards, Akashhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1696960/tps543021-remove/6536242Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:34:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:90bbec41-c107-477b-ad1a-e09b3f10c15dJagadeesh EgalaHello, Please let us know your issue as you are re-opening the ticket. Otherwise, please close the ticket by selecting &quot;This resolved my issue&quot;. Regards, Jagadeeshhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1697024/tps61175-q1-tps61175qpwprq1--thermal-pad-solder-coverageWed, 11 Nov 2026 12:21:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:165a4fe5-e30a-4e50-b35a-e18e22bd8c05Amy HuangPart Number: TPS61175-Q1 Hi, We are currently evaluating the soldering quality of the exposed thermal pad for the TPS61175QPWPRQ1. Could you please advise whether Texas Instruments has any specific requirements or recommendations regarding the acceptable solder coverage of the exposed thermal pad after reflow? Is there a specified minimum percentage of the thermal pad area that should be soldered? Is there a specified maximum allowable voiding percentage under the thermal pad? Does TI have an application note, manufacturing guideline, or other document defining the acceptance criteria for this package? Could you please clarify the exact area being assessed for solder wetting on the exposed pad? Kindly refer to the attached photos. Thank you! Could you please help verify if the test methodology as shown in our attached photos is compliant? We are evaluating the solder joint using X-ray inspection and would like to establish an appropriate acceptance criterion based on TI&#39;s recommendations. Thank you in advance for your support.TPS61175-Q1https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1695010/tps54kc23-tps54kc23-simplis-model-encrypted---nda-process/6536229Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:16:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:cfbe7968-c3eb-4211-9884-02f355fe8264Eduardo AvellanI hope this help you on the simulations thanks!https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1695010/tps54kc23-tps54kc23-simplis-model-encrypted---nda-process/6536227Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:16:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:0dca6c32-b023-42f3-8a10-b2d9827a862dEduardo AvellanHi Calan, This is our current design, please check it The inductor: XAL1010-681MED Coilcraft | Fixed Inductors | DigiKey Marketplace