• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 63 subscribers
  • Views 4722 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

UC1525B for Active clamp forward application

Mahesh KC03
Intellectual 1360 points

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UC1525B, UCC2897A, UC1823, LM5026, UCC2891, LM5025, LM5034, UC1825-SP, UC1825, UC1843-HIREL

Hi,

One of my customer wants to use the UC1525B for an active clamp forward application. Given that it has 2 PWM outputs with adjustable dead time, can it be used in such an application? Are there any other considerations to be taken care of?

  • 0
    TI__Expert 4015 points
    Because of the required orientation of the body diode of the Active clamp FET, either a high side N-FET is required, or more typically, a P-FET is used. See this link for a description of active clamp operation. www.ti.com/.../snva591.pdf .
    For this reason the outputs from an active clamp controller are typically non-complimentary. I would recommend looking at the UCC2897A.

    Hope this helps,

    Thanks

    Billy
  • 0 in reply to Billy Long
    TI__Intellectual 1360 points

    Hi Bill,

    Thank you for the answer.

    If we use an N-FET with a high side gate driver circuit/IC, this device can still be used for driving the active clamp. Am I right?

    As shown in the figure shown below, the high side N-FET offers other advantages like a lower clamp capacitor rating and lower RDson. 

    Instead of UCC2897A, can we use UC1823 which has 2 in-phase outputs with programmable dead time to drive a P-FET based active clamp?

  • 0 in reply to Mahesh KC03
    TI__Expert 4015 points

    Hi Mahesh, if you use a high side driver you can use the UC1525B to drive an active clamp I believe, but as each output is only active half the time, you will have a maximum duty cycle of 40% which is probably not ideal. You would probably be better off using a single ended controller with a higher duty cycle and generating the compliment of the gate drive externally.

    The UC1823 does not look like a 2 output controller to me. It appears to be single output.

  • 0 in reply to Billy Long
    TI__Genius 9130 points

    Mahesh, Billy,

    Maybe I can add more info here to help.

    The datasheet for UC1525B says that it's not recommended for new designs, in big red letters across the top of every page - so really, it's best avoided.

    The UC1525B is a very old bipolar IC (well over 20 years!), so it has very high bias power consumption 14 mA (not including gate drive current). It's also voltage-mode only, and has very low output drive capability (200 mA).

    Finally, the 2 outputs are driven to the same duty cycle D (D < 50% max) but phase-shifted 180 degrees - it's a push-pull or half-bridge controller, so not suitable for active-clamp forward, where the outputs need to be D and (1-D) with appropriate dead-time.

    You should consider one of TI's dedicated active-clamp forward PWM IC's, most of them are current-mode, some voltage-mode, all have the necessary dead-time control built-in, and can readily drive an external PFET clamp. Some can be configured to drive an NFET clamp via external high-side driver.

    LM5026 - active-clamp, current-mode, single channel, integrated startup

    UCC2897A - active-clamp, current-mode, single channel, integrated startup

    UCC2891/2/3/4 - active-clamp, current-mode, single channel, integrated startup (1/3 versions only)

    LM5025/A/B/C/D - active-clamp, voltage-mode, single channel, integrated startup to (various feature differences)

    LM5027A - active-clamp, voltage-mode, single channel, integrated startup, SR drive

    LM5034 - active-clamp, current-mode, dual channel interleaved, integrated startup

    I attach a spreadsheet which compares the above IC's by key features and parameters, which may be helpful.

    active_clamp_IC_parameter-data.xlsx

    I hope this helps answer your question, if so please click the "verify answer" button.

    Thanks,

    Bernard

  • 0 in reply to Bernard Keogh
    TI__Intellectual 1360 points
    Hi Bernard,
    Thank you for the comprehensive comparison table.
    The customer needs a space/mil qualified device for his application. So, the LM and UCC series will not be suitable for this application. I went through UC1825-SP which is a dual output controller with adjustable dead time. The duty cycle can be varied up to 85%. Using a high sde drive, we can drive an N-FET clamp.

    Would this be a good substitute?
  • 0 in reply to Mahesh KC03
    TI__Genius 9130 points
    Mahesh

    The UC1825 would not be suitable - again this is a dual output push-pull controller - OUTA/B are driven with the same duty cycle (up to50% max) and phase-shifted 180 degrees wrt each other - see the design example on page 12 of the datasheet, where the IC is used to control a push-pull power stage.

    If there is no suitable hi-rel/rad-hard active-clamp controller available, then you can use any single-ended controller to drive the main FET, and add external circuitry to drive the clamp FET with the complement of the main drive signal, with appropriate dead-time. One possible controller would be UC1843-HIREL.

    I hope this helps answer your question, if so please click the "verify answer" button.


    Thanks,
    Bernard