Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5069
Hello, I've seen in a number of posts that the LM5060 is not recommended as a method to provide over-current protection but it is unclear to me why that is the case. From section 8.1.5 in the datasheet, the overcurrent fault detection seems like it should provide protection in the case of a hard short circuit by monitoring the voltage drop across the FET. I understand that the factors here are the time it takes to turn off the FET (dependent on the capacitor at the TIMER pin), the variation in Rdson of the FET, and the ability of the FET to handle the maximum possible short-circuit current for the given response time. But if all of those are sized correctly, is there any reason this device cannot be used as a short-circuit protection switch?
I understand the LM5069 is recommended for over-current protection as it provides current limiting in the case of over-current as well as short circuit protection, but the quiescent current for the LM5069 is much too high for my battery application. I am hoping the LM5060 will be sufficient as a short-circuit-only protection device.
Thanks,
Jess