This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: BQ24725A
Our customer have dsign in BQ24725A and current they are setting the chagring current to 3250mA show as below. However, when RD measure the actually charging current , they only measure the max current 2.6A . Coudl you kinldy hlep us check why there is difference between the set currnet and actual current? . Also, the battery pack they are currenty use is using TI guage BQ40Z50R1 and we attach BQ24725A schematic as well.
Abvoe, please kinldy help us and if thre is any quesiton, please feel free to let me know
Is the measured charge current 2.6 A or 2.962 A, as shown in the GUI?
Also, is the charge current accurate for other charge current settings? If possible, please send me the measured charge current when the charge current is set to each of the following values: 0.5 A, 1 A, 1.5 A, 2 A, 2.5 A, and 3 A.
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Angelo Zhang87:
We have double check with RD. The charge current will be a little different every time they test it and the charging current is always between 2.6 to 2.9A but it wont reach to 3205mA set changing current. We have ask RD to run some other current setting as your suggestion and we are waiting for the feedback. At the meantime, Could you have any idea why might cause this? and if there is any other setting that we can try? please let me know
In reply to Alec Chen:
There are a few conditions which could cause ICHG to be reduced. For example, if the adapter is overloaded and cannot power the system and charge the battery at the same time, then the BQ24725A will enter DPM. The charge current will be reduced in order to prioritize the system and keep the adapter from crashing.
For reference, here is some ICHG accuracy data that I measured on an EVM. The measured ICHG is well within the regulation accuracy range given in the datasheet. Higher ICHG register settings should be more accurate, which is why I'm interested to see your data at lower ICHG settings. If lower ICHG settings are accurate but 3250 mA is not, then a feature such as DPM could be kicking in and reducing your charge current.
In addition to collecting the ICHG accuracy data at the current settings that I mentioned, here are some other things you can check:
1) Are you testing this with a system load connected, or is it only the adapter, the charger, and the battery?
2) Your adapter voltage is 19 V, according to your schematic. What is the adapter's current capability?
3) What is your input current register setting?
4) What is your battery voltage when you try to test this, and what is your charge voltage register setting?
5) What is the measured voltage on the ILIM pin?
Here are info for your the question that you asked.
==> They test battery with system load on. However, the system standby mode. the system load should be less than 10W.
==>The Adapter is 90W which should be more that enough for the testing condition
==>The input current setting is 5A
==>The battery voltage is typical 10.8V(3P) and chareging voltage register is set to 12.6V
==>We currenlty set the voltage of ILIM to 0.79V with didvide resistance, and with Rsr 0.01 ohm , and ICHG 3.2A max, the VLIM should be aroound 0.64V which the current setting should match the desgin.
We still waiting for the the other Load testing result( they need the S/W RD's help to testing it.) and we will update to you when we have it
at the meatime, if you have any other solutions that you can think of, please let us know, thanks in advacne
Thanks for providing that info. Let me know when you have the data for the measured charge current at various charge current register settings (0.5 A, 1 A, 1.5 A, 2 A, 2.5 A, and 3 A).
Have you been able to collect this data yet?
Sorry for the late reply. We have run some test with RD and collect some data for your reference.
First , original setting, charging current 3.2A :
As you can see the setting and measure result , there are 15% off form the charging current setting
And then , we adjust the charging current to 512mA. and then there are still about 15% off the setting current as you can see the figure as below:
And we have tried another current setting, and it seems have the same issue and RD think that there is no need to testing more current
Besides that, we also notice other issue. for the pre-charge, the current is not accurate as well, it is higher that Rd set. please see log as below:
Also, the Input charge current is also not accurate according to the RD's test. Currently the setting is 4.15A@19V and what we actually measure will be upto 90W(charging the system supply at the same). It seems all the current setting on BQ24725A are not accurate, please kinldy give us some suggestion about this issue. thanks in advance
And other than the current setting issue, we also notice that the inrush current is too big when battery plugged in(no adapter) . please the waveform below: (when adapter plug in the inrush only around 10A). we are trying to reduce the inrush and if you have any suggestion, please let us know as well. i also attache the BQ24725A schematic again
Above, if there is any question, please fee free to let me know. And hope to hear form you soon
Thanks for sending those detailed measurements!
The fact that IBUS and ICHG are both consistently about 15% off across different register settings suggests that the sense resistors may be inaccurate and 15% off from 10 mΩ. The BQ24725A detects the input current and the charge current using Ohm's law: IBUS = (ACP - ACN)/Rac and ICHG = (SRP - SRN)/Rsr. Therefore, if the sense resistors are slightly inaccurate, then the BQ24725A's current regulation will also be thrown off.
Are you using the same type of 10 mΩ sense resistors for Rac and Rsr? If so, do you have another type of 10 mΩ resistor that you can try instead?
Also, I noticed that your schematic uses a 3 mΩ Rac sense resistor instead of 10 mΩ. Is this correct?
Regarding the inrush current issue, you could try removing one of the 22 µF capacitors on VBAT to see if that improves the issue. Aside from that, please take a look at the following application report for methods to reduce inrush current:
We have tried the solution that you suggest. We have replace both Rac and Rsr with a new 10 mΩ and it seems that there are not much improvement of the current accurate. Could you help if there is any other suggestion that we coudl tried for the this issue? Due to thier next built scheudle , RD need us to solve this issue soon as you can. therefore, pleae help us with this. thanks in advance
As the inruch current solution, we are trying now and will give you update soon
There are two approaches you can try:
1) Use a slightly smaller sense resistor (8.2 mΩ instead of 10 mΩ). This could make your ICHG register setting and actual ICHG match more closely.
2) Use larger sense resistors (for example, 20 mΩ instead of 10 mΩ). A larger sense resistor allows for more accurate current regulation at the cost of higher conduction loss. However, if you use 20 mΩ, be aware that your register settings need to be double your desired currents. For example, in order to have ICHG = 3.2 A, you would need to set the Charge Current register setting to 6.4 A.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.