This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: BQ24650
I have an application in which a boost converter (TPS61087) runs directly from my LiIon battery, which is charged using BQ24650. The BQ24650 data sheet specifies specific, low-value output capacitors that are commensurate with its feedback compensation loop. In my case, 10uF. But the boost converter wants at least twice that on its input. So, what happens if I use a larger output cap? Or, is it sufficient to isolate the boost input caps from the charger using a low-value resistance?
It is not the specific output capacitance that affect the feedback compensation loop, but the resonant frequency of the LC output filter (section 8.3.8 of datasheet). This link in the software section of the product page has a calculator tool that can help you in deciding the right value: http://www.ti.com/product/BQ24650/toolssoftware
Please click "This resolved my issue" button if this post answers your question
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Kedar Manishankar:
The spreadsheet recommends a 15uH inductor and 10uF cap for a 1A charge current.
I understand that it's the combination of L and C that is important. But the inductance value is constrained by other factors, namely duty cycle and charge current, which, in turn, constrains the capacitance value in light of the resonant frequency requirement. My problem is that the boost supply needs a larger input capacitor, and the charger buck supply can't accommodate that larger value. So, my question is still the same. What happens if the resonant frequency of the output circuit is lower than 10KHz? And, is it sufficient to isolate that output using a low-value resistance with the boost input cap on the other side?
In reply to Richard Moran:
You are correct that your input capacitance of the boost converter would add to the output LC resonant frequency of BQ24650. It is not recommended to operate charger outside of recommended frequency range as the internal feedback loop has inbuilt poles and zeroes to guarantee stability when the double pole of the LC is centered between 12-17 kHz. Operation of the buck charger has not been validated outside of this range.
What is the input capacitance you have to add for your boost converter? Lowering the inductance can also help keep LC resonant frequency in recommended range. Choosing inductance is a tradeoff, as lower inductance has lower DCR (less effect on efficiency) but higher inductor ripple current and faster response to transients. 15uH is recommended for 1A charging as voltage drop across higher DCR at lower currents can be accepted to get lower ripple current and faster transient response, but at higher currents the effect on efficiency is increased.
Also yes, using a low value resistance between the output capacitors of BQ24650 and input capacitors of boost converter, can decrease the effect of the boost converter's input capacitors on the stability of BQ24650 but has not been quantified or validated.
Thanks for responding. The input to my boost converter has two 22uF caps in parallel. It sounds like the BQ24650 is just too touchy to risk using it in this application. I was able to find another option (LT3650-4.2) that does not have these restrictions.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.