On the TPS54613 part is it required to put a pull-up on the ENA pin? It doesn't seem to simulate properly if the pin is not pulled-up. Currently we only have a 0.047 uF cap to ground connected to the pin.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
On the TPS54613 part is it required to put a pull-up on the ENA pin? It doesn't seem to simulate properly if the pin is not pulled-up. Currently we only have a 0.047 uF cap to ground connected to the pin.
Hi Richard,
ENA pin does not require any pull-up voltage because it has an internal current source of 5uA.
If you placed a 47nF cap on ENA/SS pin then the delay time should be 11.28ms and slow-start time of 6.58ms (refer to section 7.3.2, page 10 of the DS).
Can you share part of the circuit diagram and voltage waveform across ENA/SS?
Best regards,
Excel
Excel,
Attached is a copy of that part of the circuit. Please let me know if you have or need any additional information.TPS54613 Circuit.pdf
Hi Richard,
Thanks for sharing the schematic diagram.
Can you provide the SS/ENA waveform with and without pullup?
Best regards,
Excel
Sorry, I didn't realize that I had cut off the bottom of the circuit. The Cap C58 pin 2 is tied to ground. There is no waveform associated with it.
Hi Richard,
I did the startup simulation using the PSpice model with and without SS cap and at both case the Vout was regulating properly. Refer to the figure below.
To help you better in resolving your issue, please provide the waveforms of the SS pins and VOUT at startup.
Simulation conditions: VIN = 6V, VOUT = 3.3V and Iload = 6A
Best regards,
Excel