This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320DM6467T: DDR2 termination

Part Number: TMS320DM6467T

Team,

My customer has the following question.

We are performing a Hyperlynx simulation to verify DDR2 timing for a new design, and are running into timing issues. The architecture uses a two chip Balanced T routing with 22 ohm series terminations, and meets all layout guidelines and length matching requirements specified by the TI documentation. We have found that the simulation model can pass by adding a parallel termination to Vtt right after the T junction of the routing, which is a standard termination scheme for DD2 architectures. However, the TI documentation explicitly says that this termination scheme is not allowed and I am trying to understand why. See the datasheet excerpt below.

 

DM6467T.docx

  • Aaron,

    How can you be having timing problems with a DDR2 Hyperlynx simulation?  Our IBIS models do not contain timing information.

    The support model for these devices was to provide routing guidance and routing rules for a limited set of layouts/topologies.  Simulations were completed to validate that the DDR timing requirements would be met with our device as long as the rules were followed.  That is why the datasheet is restrictive on the implementation of the termination

    Please attach the table showing the routed track lengths where you verified that the routing rules were met.

    Tom