Hi,
According to document SLVUBC8A, "For 3.3-V VIO, a switched version of the 3.3-V supply rail enabled by SMPS5 can be used to supply VIO_IN which allows VIO_IN to be supplied after VCCA, but before GPIO_4 is enabled in the sequence. "
On the other hand, in figure 5 "Power-up sequence" it can be seen that by feeding VIO_IN with SMPS5, the GPIO_2, GPIO_4, INT, RESET_OUT and I2C pins signals will be available, even though the feeding process of the DRA has not been completed. This leads to the scenario where a peripheral (the PMIC) is trying to communicate with the DRA, introducing line tensions, when the DRA is not yet fully powered.
And since "All IO Cells are NOT Fail-safe compliant (DRA) and should not be externally driven in absence of their IO supply" (SPRS993E):
- Is this behaviour dangerous for the DRA?
- Is it not better to feed the VIO_IN with the signal VIO_3V3?
Regards,