<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RF &amp; microwave</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/</link><description>Products covered in this section are Digital Radio (Gray Chip) Products. </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Request for technical review regarding potential defect in AFE7920EVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1649125/afe7920evm-request-for-technical-review-regarding-potential-defect-in-afe7920evm/6383966</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 07:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:aa96c986-81ec-4301-bed0-8ee0d4d0f217</guid><dc:creator>Minho Choi</dc:creator><description>Dear Mirana, Thank you so much for your kind support and for arranging a replacement board for us. We truly appreciate your helpful and prompt assistance throughout this process. As requested, I have already provided our shipping address and contact information in my previous message. Please let me know if you need any further details to proceed with the shipment. Regarding the return of our current revision-C board, could you please guide us on how to send it back? Specifically, please let us know the return shipping address and if there are any specific carrier accounts or instructions we should use for the shipment. Thank you again for your excellent support. Best regards, Minho Choi</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: AFE7769: Could not able to find details about pin descriptions of AFE7769 in its data sheet</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1655630/afe7769-could-not-able-to-find-details-about-pin-descriptions-of-afe7769-in-its-data-sheet</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:fd39e70f-8388-4ca3-8547-37285d197e2d</guid><dc:creator>Nagaraju Uppalapati</dc:creator><description>Part Number: AFE7769 Could not able to find details about pin descriptions of AFE7769 in its data sheet</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/AFE7769">AFE7769</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2188-SAFETY: Requirement of Spice model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653162/awr2188-safety-requirement-of-spice-model-for-awr2944ebsaltrq1/6383157</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a73789be-0a2d-41b7-971f-390b9f0113b0</guid><dc:creator>Ahanaf Ahmed</dc:creator><description>Hi Mothinathan, I checked with our design team. We do not support this software thus the reason why we do not have the models. Thanks, Ahanaf</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: IWRL6432WMOD: Using multiple IWRL6432WMOD with overlapping views</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1651240/iwrl6432wmod-using-multiple-iwrl6432wmod-with-overlapping-views/6382384</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:17d8f74b-c4f0-46c6-8297-8a0c310c304a</guid><dc:creator>Ankit Mohanty</dc:creator><description>Hi Kenny, You can use three IWRL6432WMOD to cover complete 360-degree view without any interference/cross talk as the IWRL6432WMOD has field of view of 120deg. However, you can choose to have additional (4) IWRL6432WMOD to have overlap and better/longer Field of View range. The mmWave radar has in-built algorithm to reject any interference/cross talk from any other mmWave radar. Regards Ankit</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: PSPICE-FOR-TI: Request the Spice model of LMG1020 to attach in Altium Designer</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1655307/pspice-for-ti-request-the-spice-model-of-lmg1020-to-attach-in-altium-designer</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ba4ae034-ef66-4570-80a3-37ba47287485</guid><dc:creator>May Hnin Htet</dc:creator><description>Part Number: PSPICE-FOR-TI Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMG1020 Hi TI support team, I downloaded the Pspice Transient Model (Rev C) in order to attach the model with the LMG1020 component in my Altium Designer 17.1.9 version. When I extracted the folder, the correct file (such as .lib, .sub, or .cir) for the spice model has not been found. Could you please guide me where to find it. or I would really appreciate if you could provide the correct spice model file so that I could run the simulation. The file I downloaded is ticked in Red Marker as seen in the screenshoot attached. please kindly review it for your reference. Thank you so much in advance.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/PSPICE_2D00_FOR_2D00_TI">PSPICE-FOR-TI</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/LMG1020">LMG1020</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Request for technical review regarding potential defect in AFE7920EVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1649125/afe7920evm-request-for-technical-review-regarding-potential-defect-in-afe7920evm/6381292</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1b52bcee-c325-4a38-b470-3145385b35d4</guid><dc:creator>Minho Choi</dc:creator><description>Dear Mirana Emigh, Thank you for your request. Please find the requested information below: Name: Minho Choi Address: Room 716, ITBT Building, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (04763) Email: mkiuyh@hanyang.ac.kr Thank you for your support. Best regards, Minho Choi ESoC Laboratory Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Request for technical review regarding potential defect in AFE7920EVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1649125/afe7920evm-request-for-technical-review-regarding-potential-defect-in-afe7920evm/6381253</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a7b6d86c-fcc4-4666-b7aa-b28865ff6f7c</guid><dc:creator>Mirana Emigh</dc:creator><description>Hi Minho, Thanks for your message. I don&amp;#39;t expect significant differences in performance with older revisions, but let me look into sending you a new board. Could you please provide a preferred name, shipping address, and email? You can also directly message me if you prefer not to post this information publicly. Please also send back the board you are currently using for TI to review. Thanks! Mirana</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Serdes-FIFO error</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653409/afe7920evm-serdes-fifo-error/6380073</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:aa6525f7-e28b-4fe1-8a03-47664ee418cf</guid><dc:creator>Aman Thombre</dc:creator><description>Hi Taro, Please try the modifications I suggested via email. As we had to upgrade to JESD204C and use a new lane rate, we will likely have to make a few more modifications to the 204C IP. Thanks! Aman</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Request for technical review regarding potential defect in AFE7920EVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1649125/afe7920evm-request-for-technical-review-regarding-potential-defect-in-afe7920evm/6379164</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:fa674ecd-49fb-4443-bb9f-9f256812f50e</guid><dc:creator>Minho Choi</dc:creator><description>Hi Mirana, I would appreciate a prompt response to my previous email. I would like to determine as soon as possible whether this issue is caused by a hardware defect. If the board is indeed defective, please let me know whether a replacement or refund can be provided. I would also like to reiterate a point that continues to concern me. I suspect that the board originally shipped to us may have been an older revision ending with &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;. As I have mentioned several times before, when I perform exactly the same setup and sequence of operations, the board with a revision ending in &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; (a board borrowed from another company, marked &amp;quot;AFE7920EVM DC101D&amp;quot; above the serial number label) works correctly without any issues. However, the board that I purchased, which is the revision ending in &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, consistently exhibits the problems described earlier and does not function properly. Attached below is a photo of the packaging box of the board that I purchased. The SEAL DT on the label shows &amp;quot;08/10/20&amp;quot; , which suggests that the unit may have been manufactured or packaged quite a long time ago. Therefore, I am also wondering whether the issue could be related to being supplied with an older board revision that is incompatible with the setup we are trying to use. I would appreciate it if you could investigate this possibility as well and provide clarification. Thank you for your support. Best regards, Minho Choi ESoC Laboratory Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: AFE7950: TX ERROR</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1654150/afe7950-tx-error</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c5c585b4-442a-4b33-aa0d-eeea3249af80</guid><dc:creator>Danilo A.</dc:creator><description>Part Number: AFE7950 Hi Team, Posting on behalf of our customer. I&amp;#39;ll share this E2E post with our customer so he can reply when needed. We are currently using the afe7950, and 4GHz 200MHz OFDM communication signals are functioning well for both transmission and reception. In another project, we are using a 4GHz carrier frequency raised to 4.87GHz. Since we suspect errors caused by IQ imbalance when raising the frequency to 4.87GHz, we intend to apply both the QMC automatic and manual correction functions. I am sending this email to request technical support regarding this issue. We have consulted various manuals and attempted different approaches, but we have not been able to find a solution regarding the configuration. Currently, when demodulating the IQ using a Spectrum IQ Analyzer, the IQ waveform exhibits vertical mirroring, in-phase, and Q-axis disappearance at regular intervals. Regards, Danilo</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/Energy%2binfrastructure">Energy infrastructure</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/AFE7950">AFE7950</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2188-SAFETY: Requirement of Spice model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653162/awr2188-safety-requirement-of-spice-model-for-awr2944ebsaltrq1/6377037</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4cb17367-d657-4c7c-8b89-5f6e21ef8611</guid><dc:creator>Mothinathan Loganathan</dc:creator><description>Hi Ahanaf, The spice model is required for behavioral simulation of the IC in Mentor graphics&amp;#39; Xpedetion AMS. the HFSS model we are not looking ur current requirement. Thank you.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2188-SAFETY: Requirement of Spice model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653162/awr2188-safety-requirement-of-spice-model-for-awr2944ebsaltrq1/6376272</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1b507d51-0ca0-4874-8785-cae7bd94bb6b</guid><dc:creator>Ahanaf Ahmed</dc:creator><description>Hi Mothinathan, I talked to the systems team and they mention that we have the HFSS model. Is that something that you are looking for? Also one quick question, what would be the use of the spice model and why do you guys need it? Thanks, Ahanaf</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2188-SAFETY: Requirement of Spice model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653162/awr2188-safety-requirement-of-spice-model-for-awr2944ebsaltrq1/6376089</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1aa21454-7af6-4db2-8428-c637338b59b5</guid><dc:creator>Ahanaf Ahmed</dc:creator><description>Hi Mothinathan, I already asked our Systems team and as soon as they get back to me, I will share the files with you! Thanks, Ahanaf</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2944PEVM: AWR2944PEVM Configuration for Human detection</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1651133/awr2944pevm-awr2944pevm-configuration-for-human-detection/6375862</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:fae272f4-30a5-4317-a5c3-f197ea73cca0</guid><dc:creator>Cesar</dc:creator><description>Hi, Another customer had issues with Python 3.14 and had to use an earlier release. I am using python version 3.12.8 with no problems I hope this helps thank you Cesar</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Request for technical review regarding potential defect in AFE7920EVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1649125/afe7920evm-request-for-technical-review-regarding-potential-defect-in-afe7920evm/6375365</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a5865216-0424-49e5-961f-ded20981aa5f</guid><dc:creator>Minho Choi</dc:creator><description>Hello Mirana, I ran the requested AFE soft reset debug sequence. The run sequence was: setup.py devinit.py AFE_softReset_debug.py The debug script calls AFE.softReset() only. During AFE.softReset(), Latte printed: #====== #Executing .. AFE79xx/bringup/AFE_softReset_debug.py #Start Time 2026-06-09 15:43:44.028000 DONOT_OPEN_Atharv_FULL - Device registers reset. SPI is not working. #Error: exceptions must be old-style classes or derived from BaseException, not NoneType From the log, the script did enter AFE.softReset(), and the device register reset step was executed. However, the AFE SPI readback check failed during softReset. At this point, it looks like the AFE SPI interface is not being enabled or is not responding correctly. I also checked the soldering condition of the SPI lines with a multimeter, and confirmed that the connections appear to be continuous and properly connected. I have also attached the related screenshots and the Python file used to run AFE.softReset(). Best regards, Minho Choi ESoC Laboratory Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea AFE_softReset_debug.py # ============================================================ # AFE softReset debug script # # Run order in Latte: # 1) setup.py # 2) devinit.py # 3) AFE_softReset_debug.py # # Purpose: # Run only AFE.softReset() and generate an English debug log # for TI support. # ============================================================ # ------------------------------------------------------------ # Set AFE SPI/API log file # ------------------------------------------------------------ logDumpInst . setFileName ( ASTERIX_DIR + DEVICES_DIR + r &amp;quot; \AFE_softReset_debug.txt &amp;quot; ) logDumpInst . logFormat = 0x 1 logDumpInst . rewriteFile = 1 logDumpInst . rewriteFileFormat4 = 1 device . optimizeWrites = 0 device . rawWriteLogEn = 1 print ( &amp;quot; ============================================================ &amp;quot; ) print ( &amp;quot; AFE softReset debug start &amp;quot; ) print ( &amp;quot; Configured chipId = &amp;quot; + hex ( chipId )) print ( &amp;quot; Configured chipVersion = &amp;quot; + hex ( chipVersion )) print ( &amp;quot; ============================================================ &amp;quot; ) # ------------------------------------------------------------ # Run AFE soft reset only # ------------------------------------------------------------ AFE . softReset () print ( &amp;quot; ============================================================ &amp;quot; ) print ( &amp;quot; AFE softReset debug complete &amp;quot; ) print ( &amp;quot; Read chipType = &amp;quot; + hex ( AFE . systemStatus . chipType )) print ( &amp;quot; Read chipId = &amp;quot; + hex ( AFE . systemStatus . chipId )) print ( &amp;quot; Read chipVersion = &amp;quot; + hex ( AFE . systemStatus . readChipVersion )) print ( &amp;quot; ============================================================ &amp;quot; )</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2188-SAFETY: Requirement of Spice model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653162/awr2188-safety-requirement-of-spice-model-for-awr2944ebsaltrq1/6375230</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a5167d94-193c-4f1f-adba-27c2ecfa82e5</guid><dc:creator>Mothinathan Loganathan</dc:creator><description>Hi Ahanf, SPICE or PSpice model is required with the format .LIB or .Mod. Please send it. Thank you, mothinathan.loganathan@aptiv.com.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7920EVM: Serdes-FIFO error</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653409/afe7920evm-serdes-fifo-error/6375014</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2126842e-86e4-4fce-bb23-d69e81be2959</guid><dc:creator>Yamada Taro</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AFE7950: RX DSA Gain/Phase Calibration Macro Error</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1619715/afe7950-rx-dsa-gain-phase-calibration-macro-error/6375012</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c72aea56-2044-4ae7-9670-b3edb7252436</guid><dc:creator>Vijayendra Varma Siddamsetty</dc:creator><description>Hi Kazuto, I tested doRxDsaCalib C function on the AFE7950EVM using latte version 2.9 and don&amp;#39;t see this issue. C functions can be run from latte using format: CAPI. doRxDsaCalib(0,15,0,0,0) #Runs doRxDsaCalib function for all channels. When rxChainForCalib is set to 0xF, I see the output packet has 1327 entries and calibration fails with an error even if one out of the 4 channels input is not connected. When any individual channel calibration is run, the output packet has 370 entries and errors out if that particular channel input is not connected. Can you please check if rxChainForCalib parameter is getting passed correctly to the function? Regards, Vijay</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: AFE7920EVM: Serdes-FIFO error</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653409/afe7920evm-serdes-fifo-error</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:21e3d32a-6038-462b-825b-39819449bf94</guid><dc:creator>Yamada Taro</dc:creator><description>Part Number: AFE7920EVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AFE7920 I am trying to use the ZCU102 to communicate with the AFE7920, and have successfully achieved an IQ rate of 491.52 MHz. However, when attempting to adjust to an IQ rate of 983.04 MHz, a Serdes-FIFO error is consistently reported. I believe the issue lies in the configuration of the 204C IP core downloaded from TI. Attached are the header file configuration of the 204C IP and the transceiver configuration in Latte. What modifications are needed? Additionally, is there any reference design for the ZCU102 at an IQ rate of 983.04 MHz? TI_IP_10Gbps_8Lane_ConfigLmk.txt jesd_link_params.txt</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/AFE7920">AFE7920</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/AFE7920EVM">AFE7920EVM</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/tags/Wireless%2bInfrastructure">Wireless Infrastructure</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: AWR2188-SAFETY: Requirement of Spice model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/rf-microwave-group/rf-microwave/f/rf-microwave-forum/1653162/awr2188-safety-requirement-of-spice-model-for-awr2944ebsaltrq1/6374693</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6cd473a6-777f-4426-b0ed-2269f31eb163</guid><dc:creator>Ahanaf Ahmed</dc:creator><description>Hi, Are you looking for BSDL and IBIS model for AWR2944EBSALTRQ1. Thanks, Ahanaf</description></item></channel></rss>