Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DCA1000EVM
Tool/software:
Hello,
I am currently using TI’s mmWave sensor IWR1843BOOST along with the DCA1000EVM to capture raw ADC data, which is being stored in PCAP format via Ethernet. I have a question regarding the correct reshaping format of raw ADC data obtained from DCA1000EVM when used with the IWR1843BOOST in MIMO mode.
Note: The raw ADC data has already been converted to complex values (I + jQ) and is stored as a 1D NumPy array of
complex64values in Python.--> The total data length is exactly 160,000 complex samples.
System Setup:
-
2 Tx and 4 Rx
-
16 chirps per frame
-
125 ADC samples per chirp
-
10 total frames
-
Complex I/Q data (already parsed and converted from PCAP)
My Question:
I would like to confirm whether the following reshape format is valid:
reshape[Number_of_frame][Number_of_chirp * Number_of_TX][Number_of_RX][Number_of_samples]In my case, this means reshaping the 1D complex array into:
[10][32][4][125]This reshape produces consistent results for Range-Doppler processing. However, I would like to verify:
-
Does the PCAP data reflect the Tx antenna firing sequence (e.g., Tx0 → Tx1 → Tx0...) in chirp order?
-
Is this reshape format valid for MIMO mode, or is there any required reordering before forming the virtual antenna array for AoA estimation?
-
Is there any official guidance confirming that this chirp-by-chirp sequence aligns with the Tx antenna schedule?
Clarifying this will help ensure that our AoA and RCS mapping are based on a correctly interpreted chirp and antenna layout.
Thank you for your support!
Best regards,
Ji-yun Kim