<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sensors forum - Recent Threads</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:53:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum" /><item><title>IWRL6432AOPEVM: REX (request to Exit)</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626084?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:53:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c5b4fe38-bcc9-4484-b3d7-9ab7d085adc5</guid><dc:creator>James Falbo</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626084?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1626084/iwrl6432aopevm-rex-request-to-exit/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/IWRL6432AOPEVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;IWRL6432AOPEVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a REX (request to exit) door sensor, and using the IWRL6432AoPEVM, what firmware and config files that come with the low power visualizer are recommended?&amp;nbsp; Do you have any other firmware you can recommend as the best starting point? Same with config file, for ones that don&amp;#39;t come with the visulizer? Also, do you have any specific config file parameter suggestions for request to exit door sensor? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>FDC1004EVM: FDC1004 EVM Sampling and Output Rate</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626075?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e9bf61d3-217b-4c3d-a875-6f25c5349803</guid><dc:creator>Aykut Altuntop</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626075?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1626075/fdc1004evm-fdc1004-evm-sampling-and-output-rate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/FDC1004EVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;FDC1004EVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/FDC1004" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;FDC1004&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are using FDC1004 EVM board with Sensing Solution GUI 1.10.0. We have 2 problems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Data streaming does not work unless all 4 channels are enabled for reading(We are only using CIN3, other channels being enabled does not affect us but I think it is affecting the sampling speed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) This is the main problem. The plotting speed is too slow. As you can see from the screenshot, it is around 7Hz and that is the EVM Output Rate as it is written. We tried selecting &amp;quot;Add sample to graph every x seconds&amp;quot; but it dose not change anything, plotting does not get faster than 7Hz. In configuration page, 400 S/s is selected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We read the FDC1004 Datasheet and also GUI User guide(It is for an older version I guess but still useful information)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our main purpose is to get a faster/smoother plot in GUI even 40-50Hz would work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank You&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/8664.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-152569"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TMAG5253: Highest displacement resolution</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626074?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:24:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6cbb7247-8a61-40bc-b4c2-dc7b68876de3</guid><dc:creator>Christian de Graffenried</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626074?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1626074/tmag5253-highest-displacement-resolution/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/TMAG5253" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TMAG5253&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m looking for a very small Hall sensor with the highest resolution. The Hall sensor TMAG5253 is very interesting regarding its very small outlines but I don&amp;#39;t know what would be the best resolution I could get from it. Could you please share some exemples or use cases with this sensor?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot for your support&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Christian de Graffenried&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>DRV425-Q1: DRV425-Q1 Product Life and Longevity</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626060?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:46:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b0712947-5b48-4ea4-be11-4114db57128b</guid><dc:creator>Nick Adams</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1626060?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1626060/drv425-q1-drv425-q1-product-life-and-longevity/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/DRV425-Q1" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;DRV425-Q1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are working on a critical design that includes TI&amp;#39;s DRV425QWRTJRQ1 and our customer requested a technical contact to further discuss requirements that includes but not limited to MTBF and derating specific to our application. Who would be a good contact? Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nick Adams&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sr. Development Engineer&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AMC6821: I2C Communication Issues?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625960?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 09:26:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e3f2f9fb-219a-4ee0-9853-077368d8f385</guid><dc:creator>Alan Xia</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625960?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625960/amc6821-i2c-communication-issues/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/AMC6821" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AMC6821&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi team,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The customer was debugging I2C communication and discovered that the chip was unresponsive; however, measurements of the chip&amp;#39;s pin states indicated that everything was normal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There was no acknowledgment received for the very first byte transmitted&amp;mdash;the address byte. The address was sent exactly as described in the datasheet, and the waveforms also appear to be correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/023028.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-95248"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/37650.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-27229"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>IWR1843: Problem with UART-flash on self made iwr1843 PCB</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625906?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:56:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ccb172bf-a7b8-4360-a7f7-a5f4c0b75c9c</guid><dc:creator>Erwan Barzic</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625906?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625906/iwr1843-problem-with-uart-flash-on-self-made-iwr1843-pcb/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/IWR1843" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;IWR1843&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/UNIFLASH" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;UNIFLASH&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Im having a isssue flashing my chip with uniflash and I get these error messages:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ERROR] Cortex_R4_0: XXXX Received unexpected data!!!XXXX&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ERROR] Cortex_R4_0: Not able to connect to serial port. Recheck COM port selected and/or permissions&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have checked that the COM port and permissions are correct but the UART never gets pulled low when flashing. The SOP also seems to be correct. I am wondering if the reason for my problem is because of the UART pins i have used. I use pin F14 and N5.&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/3716.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-33060"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it ok to use these pins for flashing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>DRV5057-Q1: hall sensor design consult</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625847?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 06:21:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5e46787e-0446-41cf-a268-4ceea41da07d</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Liu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625847?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625847/drv5057-q1-hall-sensor-design-consult/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/DRV5057-Q1" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;DRV5057-Q1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi, we would like to use a hall sensor to measure the distance between two parts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current our space design is shown below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/06355.image.png" alt="image.png" data-temp-id="image.png-13926"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The design gap between hall sensor and magnet is about 1.65mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Goal is to measure 1.65+/-1.5mm (0.15~3.15mm) and the accuracy is expected to be 0.1mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is DRV5057-Q1 can achieve that? or any other recommendation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jerry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TDC1000-Q1: TDC1000 Short TOF Mode – Measurement Works Initially but Times Out After ~20 Seconds</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625816?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 04:38:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:9e91566f-772b-40cf-a1fa-edba27869240</guid><dc:creator>Lovi Jain</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625816?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625816/tdc1000-q1-tdc1000-short-tof-mode-measurement-works-initially-but-times-out-after-20-seconds/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/TDC1000-Q1" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TDC1000-Q1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Alicia,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your suggestion regarding PGA bypass.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After updating TOF_1 to 0x80, I am now able to receive STOP pulses and I am measuring TOF values around 42&amp;ndash;43 ticks, which is close to my expected TOF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I am now facing a&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;new issue where the measurement works correctly initially, but after approximately 20 seconds the device starts timing out and STOP is no longer generated.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My current register configuration is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;SPIWrite(CONFIG_0, 0x45);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_1, 0x41);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_2, 0x00);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_3, 0x03);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_4, 0x1F);
SPIWrite(TOF_1, 0x80);
SPIWrite(TOF_0, 0x00);
SPIWrite(TIMEOUT, 0x29);
SPIWrite(CLOCK_RATE, 0x00);
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could this behavior be related to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul style="list-style-type:disc;"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Echo listen window being too short?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SHORT_TOF_BLANK_PERIOD being too long?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PGA gain needing further increase for stable echo detection in air?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br&gt;Lovi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AWRL6844EVM: CFAR DPU threshold scale</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625743?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 20:52:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5072a6d4-05e0-405e-a724-4fa9b77a34f7</guid><dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625743?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625743/awrl6844evm-cfar-dpu-threshold-scale/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/AWRL6844EVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWRL6844EVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody"&gt;Hi TI-Team,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--StartFragment--&gt;&lt;span data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody"&gt;In the Doppler and Range Cfar configuration file, is the threshold in 20*log10 format? That number gets multiplied by 100 and then gets sent to the hwa for cfar. Shouldn&amp;#39;t there be the log base change because the range-doppler is in log2 format. Also, shouldn&amp;#39;t there be some scaling applied to that? Could you please help us understand. By the way, this is with &amp;quot;MMWAVE_L_SDK_06_00_04_01&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PGA460: BOOSTXL-PGA460: Noise Locator - Solved</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625728?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 20:09:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f318b5cb-4da6-41bb-871e-f645d6aa2f68</guid><dc:creator>Syed Akhter</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625728?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625728/pga460-boostxl-pga460-noise-locator---solved/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/PGA460" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;PGA460&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my original post, I was looking for a way to detect the source/direction of ultrasonic noise at a specific frequency using the PGA460 board. This was needed because we have multiple valves and industrial equipment near an ultrasonic flowmeter that interfered with the flowmeter readings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After field testing I have confirmed that it is possible to point the sensor in various directions and do a burst read at the frequency of interest (in my case this was ~47 khz). There were certain valves in the area that saturated the sensor above 90 dB and were able to add sound insulation prevent interference with the near by ultrasonic flowmeter.&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/20250905_5F00_080129.jpg" alt="20250905_080129.jpg" data-temp-id="20250905_080129.jpg-2552024"&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/20250905_5F00_080110.jpg" alt="20250905_080110.jpg" data-temp-id="20250905_080110.jpg-2237449"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>IWR6843AOPEVM: Spectrum Data</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625726?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:56:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2faf9b9d-8a32-4536-95e3-bf76dda7382e</guid><dc:creator>Zai Mei Chen</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625726?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625726/iwr6843aopevm-spectrum-data/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/IWR6843AOPEVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;IWR6843AOPEVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Please assist with following spectrum data.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol style="margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;" start="1"&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;TX Parameters needed (DD1494 Transmitter page block listed)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;ol style="margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;" start="1"&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;RF curves (-3, -20, -40, -60dB curves). We need at least 55dB of dynamic range, preferably 70dB (block 12a-d)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Harmonic levels (2&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt;, 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt;, and other), we need at least 55dB of dynamic range, preferably 70dB (block 21a-c)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Waveform parameters, pulse rise time, pulse fall time, pulse compression ratio (assumed 50-125) (block 18c-e)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Occupied Bandwidth (99% power bandwidth) (block 12e)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0in 0.75in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol style="margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;" start="2"&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;RX Parameters needed (DD1494 Receiver page block)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol style="margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;" start="1"&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Spurious Rejection level (block 20)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Intermodulation rejection level (block 22)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Rx, RF selectivity e.g. passband curve (-3, 20, 60dB points) (block 11a-c)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0in 0.75in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol style="margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;" start="3"&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;General Information (DD1494 DOD or NTIA page block)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol style="margin-top:0in;margin-bottom:0in;" start="1"&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Number of units (DOD block 8)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Number of units in the same environment (DOD block 9)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;Estimated cost (per unit or all units?) (NTIA page block 7)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li style="color:#002060;margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;font-size:12pt;font-family:Aptos, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Calibri, sans-serif;"&gt;POC information (DOD page 12)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AWR1843AOPEVM: CAN-FD Transceiver Integration</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625630?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:39:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:02921f38-4697-40d3-9d9f-e319bfe3a58b</guid><dc:creator>Marco Ancona</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625630?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625630/awr1843aopevm-can-fd-transceiver-integration/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/AWR1843AOPEVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWR1843AOPEVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/AWR1843AOP" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWR1843AOP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear TI,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have AWR1843AOP EVM board. I&amp;#39;d like to send out data on the CAN-FD transceiver. I set the S2.1 switch to ON but no data is output on the CAN transceiver. It looks like the &amp;quot;out_of_the_box_1843_mss&amp;quot; project (which is currently flashed on the AWR1843AOP EVM) doesn&amp;#39;t implement the CAN communication. Is there any demo project for the AWR1843AOP EVM which has the CAN communication active (like the &amp;quot;can_integration_example_6843&amp;quot; for the 6843 sensor family) which I can use as starting point for my development? If not can you provide step by step instructions to activate the CAN communication on the AWR1843AOP EVM board?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marco&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TDC1000-Q1: TDC1000 Short TOF mode – STOP pulse not generated after changing TOF window configuration</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625555?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:27:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8bdcb35a-60b2-4669-a4e8-173fd9156255</guid><dc:creator>Lovi Jain</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625555?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625555/tdc1000-q1-tdc1000-short-tof-mode-stop-pulse-not-generated-after-changing-tof-window-configuration/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/TDC1000-Q1" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TDC1000-Q1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/TDC1000" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TDC1000&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am working with the &lt;strong&gt;TDC1000 ultrasonic analog front-end&lt;/strong&gt; in &lt;strong&gt;Short TOF mode&lt;/strong&gt; with an external MCU via SPI. Earlier in the previous thread, I received guidance about configuring the &lt;strong&gt;Transmit + Mask + Echo listening window&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on the suggestion, I modified the configuration to increase the mask window and adjust the listening period. However, after applying the new configuration, the &lt;strong&gt;STOP pulse is not generated anymore&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My setup details are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CLKIN = 8 MHz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CLOCKIN_DIV = 1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;T0 = 0.125 &amp;micro;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;T1 = 1 &amp;micro;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Expected TOF &amp;asymp; 47 &amp;micro;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Transducer resonant frequency &amp;asymp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;700 &amp;plusmn;100 kHz&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Distance between transducer and reflector &amp;asymp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;35 mm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current register configuration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;code dir="ltr"&gt;SPIWrite(CONFIG_0, 0x45);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_1, 0x41);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_2, 0x00);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_3, 0x03);
SPIWrite(CONFIG_4, 0x1F);

SPIWrite(TOF_1, 0x50);   // 12 dB gain
SPIWrite(TOF_0, 0x00);

SPIWrite(TIMEOUT, 0x29);
SPIWrite(CLOCK_RATE, 0x00);&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this configuration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The transmit pulse is generated correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the &lt;strong&gt;STOP pulse is never generated&lt;/strong&gt;, and the measurement times out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previously (with my older configuration), I was able to receive STOP pulses and measured around &lt;strong&gt;22&amp;ndash;23 ticks&lt;/strong&gt;, but after modifying the window settings as suggested, the STOP pulse is no longer generated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you please help verify if my configuration for:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SHORT_TOF_BLANK_PERIOD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TOF_TIMEOUT_CTRL&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NUM_TX pulses&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is correct for an expected TOF around &lt;strong&gt;47 &amp;micro;s&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, is there any other register setting that might prevent the STOP pulse from being generated in Short TOF mode?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lovi Jain&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>IWR6843ISK: Azimuth/Elevation Static Heatmap</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625504?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:32:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d4c677d5-bb12-4f72-a4ba-b04209ede8a3</guid><dc:creator>Marvn Arcangel</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625504?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625504/iwr6843isk-azimuth-elevation-static-heatmap/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/IWR6843ISK" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;IWR6843ISK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to extract the azimuth and elevation data from the IWR6843ISK demo bin? This is possible on the ODS model, but only azimuth/range seems to be available for the IWR6843ISK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am aware the ISK model has relatively poor elevation resolution, but I would still like to use it if possible.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AWR1843AOPEVM: Debugging AWR1843AOPEVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625503?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:26:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a917d3e6-6c39-4ee3-a715-3a940275a986</guid><dc:creator>Marco Ancona</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625503?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625503/awr1843aopevm-debugging-awr1843aopevm/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/AWR1843AOPEVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWR1843AOPEVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/UNIFLASH" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;UNIFLASH&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/MMWAVEICBOOST" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;MMWAVEICBOOST&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dear TI,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have AWR1843AOPEVM board. I&amp;#39;m able to compile demo code with CCS and flash the .bin demo example with Uniflash to the board. I also would like to debug code. At this point it is not clear to me if I can debug the AWR1843OPEVM board in standalone mode or if MMWAVEICBOOST is needed additionally. I suppose MMWAVEICBOOST is need since AWR1843AOPEVM hasn&amp;#39;t XDS110 debug probe on it. Would it be possible to directly debug the AWR1843AOPEVM with an external debug probe ARM cortex compatible like Segger J-link?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marco&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TPS38: TPS38</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625492?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:00:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d755f9cb-6441-41af-9b87-6bd65799c318</guid><dc:creator>William Lai(CFAE)</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625492?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625492/tps38-tps38/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/TPS38" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TPS38&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi team,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our customer have the question described below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We got MPN &amp;nbsp;TPS38A909066DYYRQ1 from custom,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From datasheet, We can match the corresponding code, but Our procurement has confirmed with TI that this MPN didn&amp;rsquo;t be found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please help to clarify it or also provide similar &lt;span style="color:#000000;"&gt;parts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br&gt;William Lai&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>BOOSTXL-PGA460: Regarding the issues of GUI parameter settings and echo curves for PGA460</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625459?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:59:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d340cb24-9832-42cd-8466-4fde1b1e5733</guid><dc:creator>yf Gong</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625459?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625459/boostxl-pga460-regarding-the-issues-of-gui-parameter-settings-and-echo-curves-for-pga460/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/BOOSTXL-PGA460" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;BOOSTXL-PGA460&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/PGA460" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;PGA460&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have just started using BOOSTXL-PGA460 for development. I followed the user manual and used the LP-USB power mode, along with the muRata MA58MF14-7N transducer for short-distance measurement. The GUI settings interface is shown in the figure below.&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/QQ20260312_2D00_162200.png" alt="QQ20260312-162200.png" width="608" height="451" data-temp-id="QQ20260312-162200.png-496231"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The time-varying gain and threshold settings are shown in the figure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/QQ20260312_2D00_162218.png" alt="QQ20260312-162218.png" width="611" height="453" data-temp-id="QQ20260312-162218.png-422327"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/QQ20260312_2D00_162222.png" alt="QQ20260312-162222.png" width="607" height="450" data-temp-id="QQ20260312-162222.png-450696"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above are the default short-distance preset values provided by the GUI.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The measured echo dump graph is shown in the figure. There are significant problems with the waveform, and the ranging value remains at the maximum value all the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/QQ20260312_2D00_162240.png" alt="QQ20260312-162240.png" width="628" height="465" data-temp-id="QQ20260312-162240.png-489105"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I noticed an error in the system diagnosis at the bottom right corner. So I went to the diagnostics page and get system diagnostics. The result is shown in the picture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/QQ20260312_2D00_162232.png" alt="QQ20260312-162232.png" width="620" height="459" data-temp-id="QQ20260312-162232.png-435291"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure whether it&amp;#39;s due to a problem with the transducer frequency or voltage, or if it&amp;#39;s an issue with my gain and threshold settings that led to the incorrect measurement results. Could you please advise on how to proceed with the adjustments?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TI-MAGNETIC-SENSE-SIMULATOR: Turn off noise</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625424?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:44:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8dc653a7-ff69-4ede-a6fb-a30da7d6d17e</guid><dc:creator>Robin Strack van Schijndel</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625424?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625424/ti-magnetic-sense-simulator-turn-off-noise/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/TI-MAGNETIC-SENSE-SIMULATOR" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TI-MAGNETIC-SENSE-SIMULATOR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/TMAG5273" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;TMAG5273&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can I turn off the generated noise in the simulator? (im using TMAG5273)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AWR1843AOP: Request for awr1843aop antenna radiation pattern data</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625390?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 06:33:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:259d74c4-5bbd-4c8b-8acc-189c27aa2227</guid><dc:creator>Do-hyun Kim</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625390?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625390/awr1843aop-request-for-awr1843aop-antenna-radiation-pattern-data/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/AWR1843AOP" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWR1843AOP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d like to request the AWR1843AOP antenna radiation pattern graph data (.stp, .isg, .CATPart, .CATProduct).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is for 3D simulation purposes, to preemptively examine factors that could interfere with radio waves around the chip in the FOV during mechanical design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please note that I&amp;#39;m not requesting the gain graphs from the datasheet and EVM User&amp;#39;s Guide. I&amp;#39;m requesting data that visualizes the antenna radiation pattern generated by the actual chip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Request Priority&lt;br&gt;1. Data (.stp, .isg, .CATPart, .CATProduct)&lt;br&gt;2. Reference Documents&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>DRV5055: Is the DRV5055 correct</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625324?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:863b2ce7-204d-433a-93ef-62bc0578fa74</guid><dc:creator>QING DENG</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625324?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625324/drv5055-is-the-drv5055-correct/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/DRV5055" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;DRV5055&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does the DRV5055 meet the technical requirements in the attached document&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>LM234: Feedback on the Ideal Current Source that Engineers Demand</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625259?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:37:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d127c6a9-f84d-48f5-9bb3-e2f13bd2a5ed</guid><dc:creator>Scott Turpin</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625259?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625259/lm234-feedback-on-the-ideal-current-source-that-engineers-demand/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/LM234" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;LM234&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello To Whom It May Concern,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m an engineer designing a constant current source and if an engineer who does device under test, load under test, etc. that can give advice on the following questions? We are designing a small constant current source.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What types of devices under test (DUTs) require the most stable current sources?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What current ranges are most difficult to control precisely?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What load&amp;nbsp;impedance ranges cause problems in your current sources?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you struggle more with low current (&amp;micro;A&amp;ndash;mA) or high current stability?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What&amp;nbsp;current accuracy do you require?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What temperature drift is acceptable?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What ppm stability do your current sources need?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What current noise levels interfere with DUT measurements?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What bandwidth do you care about for noise measurements?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What load regulation do your current sources typically achieve?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At what load resistance range do they fail?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What&amp;nbsp;compliance voltage range do your testers require?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you require fast settling current sources?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the acceptable settling time after a load change?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How much do you currently pay for precision current sources?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you could design the&amp;nbsp;perfect current source for DUT testing, what specifications would it have?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We will try to achieve multiple times improvement in lower drift, higher load regulation accuracy, lower noise, and at a lower cost.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott Turpin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>DCA1000EVM: Possible defective device</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625202?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:56:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:73168163-11ff-474f-907b-5daf8cbdfdbf</guid><dc:creator>Marvn Arcangel</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625202?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625202/dca1000evm-possible-defective-device/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/DCA1000EVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;DCA1000EVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/IWR6843ISK" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;IWR6843ISK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am troubleshooting a DCA1000EVM that a customer is using. Can you help confirm my conclusion?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Summary of the Issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firs time boot of DCA1000EVM Immediately shows error. Refer to Led status below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5V_LED - Green (OK)&lt;br&gt;FPGA_DONE_LED - OFF&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DATA_TRANS_PROG_LED1 - Green&lt;br&gt;SD_DETECT_LED5 - Green&lt;br&gt;SD_FULL_LED0 - Red&lt;br&gt;SPARE_LED8 - Green&lt;br&gt;DDR_FULL_LED7 - Red&lt;br&gt;FPGA_ERR_LED2 - Red&lt;br&gt;LVDS_PATH_ERR_LED3 - Red&lt;br&gt;HEADER_ERR_LED4 - Red&lt;br&gt;EEPROM_RD_FAIL_LED6 - Red&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I love to include a screen shot but the E2E shows error when uploading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The device manager does not show DCA1000EVM. When Ethernet is connected, the port LEDs flash briefly during power-up and then turn off, and 192.168.33.180 does not respond to ping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am leaning to the conclusion that the board is faulty. Is there a way to recover this? Does re-programming the FPGA work?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PGA900: Understanding Failure Modes of the PGA900</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625124?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:55:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c434c6b1-e580-4cc4-9082-ec33d699de01</guid><dc:creator>D. Ryan</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625124?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625124/pga900-understanding-failure-modes-of-the-pga900/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/PGA900" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;PGA900&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are currently undergoing at certification effort for placing our design into production, and experienced a failure of the PGA900 IC that was not expected. The IC was in a 250F enviroment and failed to operate after about 40 hours of operation (presented with faulted output and up to 7.6mA draw. (3.5mA is nominal) The test continued in this enviroment and the failure progressed to a 0V output and 60mA draw (max current limited by resistance at 10V source).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We were able to diagnose that the VDD input is acting with low resistance (1-2 ohms). It is responding like a fixed resistance across voltages from 0-12V, so it does not seem like the internal regulators are turning on.&amp;nbsp;Access to the IC is difficult, since it is inside of a hard potted assembly and inside a sealed housing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are trying to isolate failures, however not enough is known about the IC simulate the failure on a more accessable CCA. We have try several theories, however we were wondering if you are able to provide a list or matrix of known methods which might lead to internal failure of the IC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general the IC has shown to be robust, however we are trying to root cause this failure to prevent issues in production.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you know of failures which would lead to IC failure and/or excessive current draw?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>IWRL6432AOPEVM: Quick Evaluation and Custom Config Don't Work Properly, Visualizer 5.5.4.1 with SDK 5.5.4.2</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625122?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:46:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ad34a912-d79e-4a4b-a3d5-b6db6249d70d</guid><dc:creator>Pat Broughton</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625122?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625122/iwrl6432aopevm-quick-evaluation-and-custom-config-don-t-work-properly-visualizer-5-5-4-1-with-sdk-5-5-4-2/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/IWRL6432AOPEVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;IWRL6432AOPEVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am using the IWRL6432AOPEVM evaluation board with Visualizer 5.5.4.1 which is the version packaged with my download of the MMWAVE_L_SDK_05_05_04_02. I can flash the device with the &amp;quot;Presence and Motion and Tracking&amp;quot; image using the Visualizer and load the &amp;quot;Low Power Presence Detection&amp;quot; configuration in the Configuration Dashboard, and the device seems to function properly and shows data in the plot windows. However, I am unable to load a custom configuration; the Visualizer becomes non-responsive when trying to do so. Also, I am unable to do the &amp;quot;Quick Evaluation&amp;quot;; when I try this the Visualizer says it is unable to connect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AWRL6844EVM: [AWRL6844EVM] SPI based streaming of Raw ADC Data</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625097?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 12:18:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:904b6ebb-38f0-47a6-ab5e-723d49b66051</guid><dc:creator>환희 박</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://e2e.ti.com/thread/1625097?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1625097/awrl6844evm-awrl6844evm-spi-based-streaming-of-raw-adc-data/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Part Number:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/tool/AWRL6844EVM" class="internal-link folder tool" title="Link to Tool Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWRL6844EVM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Parts Discussed in Thread:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.ti.com/product/AWRL6844" class="internal-link folder product" title="Link to Product Folder" target="_blank"&gt;AWRL6844&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello TI Support Team,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am working on implementing SPI-based ADC data logging on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;AWR6844EVM&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;following the guide in the mmWave SDK documentation (mmwave_l_sdk_06_00_05_01/docs/api_guide_xwrL684x/MMWAVE_DEMO.html - &amp;quot;SPI based streaming of Raw ADC Data&amp;quot;). &lt;br&gt;I have successfully configured the software according to the guide, but I am experiencing issues with the GPIO handshake signal and would like clarification on the correct SPI hardware connections. &lt;strong&gt;Unfortunately, I cannot attach photos due to our company&amp;#39;s security policy.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hardware Setup and Configuration:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;I followed the SDK guide and made the following configurations: &lt;br&gt;(1) Set&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;ADC_DATA_LOGGING_VIA_SPI&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;macro to 1 in &amp;quot;mmwave_demo.h&amp;quot;, &lt;br&gt;(2) Configured&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;ADC_DATA_BUFF_MAX_SIZE&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;in &amp;quot;mmwave_demo.h&amp;quot; and flashed the firmware, &lt;br&gt;(3) Changed &amp;quot;lowPowerCfg 1&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;lowPowerCfg 0&amp;quot; to disable low power mode, &lt;br&gt;(4) Changed &amp;quot;adcLogging 0&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;adcLogging 2&amp;quot; to enable SPI logging, &lt;br&gt;(5) Used FCCSP to attempt ADC data logging. My configuration uses 256 samples, 48 chirps, and 4 Rx channels, which results in a buffer size smaller than the default maximum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hardware Connection Issue:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since the AWR6844 SDK documentation does not include a specific SPI connection table, I referred to the xWRL6432 SDK&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Connection Table of SPI Interface of xWRL6432 with C232HM-DDHSL-0 Cable&amp;quot; and the AWR6844&amp;#39;s PROC182A(01_AWR)_Sch.PDF schematic document to make the cable connections. &lt;br&gt;However, I am uncertain if my connections are correct.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Could you please provide the exact SPI pin mapping for AWR6844EVM?&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Specifically, I need to know which physical pins on the EVM correspond to SPI0_CLK, SPI0_MOSI, SPI0_MISO, SPI0_CS, and GPIO Pin 5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Software Issue - GPIO Signal Toggle:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have identified a problem in the GPIO signaling mechanism in dpc.c. The code attempts to signal the FTDI device (FT2232H) using R5F GPIO Pin 5 connected to FTDI ADBUS4 (Bit 4) to indicate data transfer start and completion. The relevant code section is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[dpc.c]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;#if (ADC_DATA_LOGGING_VIA_SPI == 1)&lt;br&gt;if(gMmwMssMCB.adcLogging.enable == 2)&lt;br&gt;{&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; // ... SPI transaction setup ...&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;GPIO_pinWriteLow&lt;/strong&gt;(gSPIHostIntrBaseAddrLed, &lt;strong&gt;gSPIHostIntrPinNumLed&lt;/strong&gt;);&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; // ARM Cortex-R5F &amp;rarr; FTDI signal transmission: R5F GPIO Pin 5 LOW &amp;rarr; FTDI Bit 4 LOW&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; transferOK = MCSPI_transfer(gMcspiHandle[CONFIG_MCSPI0], &amp;amp;spiTransaction);&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; // MCSPI_transfer: Transfer radar data to FTDI via SPI&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; GPIO_pinWriteHigh(gSPIHostIntrBaseAddrLed, gSPIHostIntrPinNumLed);&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; // Data transfer complete (toggle): R5F GPIO Pin 5 HIGH &amp;rarr; FTDI Bit 4 HIGH&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; // ...&lt;br&gt;}&lt;br&gt;#endif&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[mmwave_demo.c]&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;// Configure the FTDI HOST INTR PIN&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; gSPIHostIntrBaseAddrLed = (uint32_t) AddrTranslateP_getLocalAddr(SPI_HOST_INTR_BASE_ADDR);&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;gSPIHostIntrPinNumLed &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;= &lt;strong&gt;SPI_HOST_INTR_PIN&lt;/strong&gt;;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[ti_drivers_config.h (R5F GPIO Pin 5)]&lt;br&gt;/* GPIO PIN Macros */&lt;br&gt;#define SPI_HOST_INTR_BASE_ADDR (CSL_APP_GIO_U_BASE)&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;#define SPI_HOST_INTR_PIN (5U)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;#define SPI_HOST_INTR_DIR (GPIO_DIRECTION_OUTPUT)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Current Issues: When R5F executes&amp;nbsp;GPIO_pinWriteLow(), FTDI Bit 4 does not change to LOW&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;Problem Description:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the R5F executes&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;GPIO_pinWriteLow()&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;to signal transfer start, the FTDI ADBUS4 (Bit 4) does not change to LOW. &lt;br&gt;My Python script reads the FTDI GPIO state, and &lt;strong&gt;value &amp;amp; 0x10&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;always returns 0x10 (HIGH), never 0x00 (LOW). &lt;br&gt;The expected behavior is: Before SPI transfer &amp;rarr; FTDI reads 0xFC (Bit 4 = HIGH), During SPI transfer (after GPIO_pinWriteLow) &amp;rarr; FTDI reads 0xEC (Bit 4 = LOW), After SPI transfer (after GPIO_pinWriteHigh) &amp;rarr; FTDI reads 0xFC (Bit 4 = HIGH). &lt;br&gt;However, the actual behavior is that FTDI always reads 0xFC (Bit 4 = HIGH), causing my Python script to hang in an infinite loop waiting for the LOW signal. &lt;br&gt;I have verified using&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;GPIO_pinRead()&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;that GPIO Pin 5 toggles correctly (0 &amp;rarr; 1 &amp;rarr; 0 &amp;rarr; 1) on the R5F side, so the software appears to be functioning correctly, but the signal is not reaching the FTDI device.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Questions:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SPI Connection:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Could you please provide the&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Connection Table of SPI Interface of AWRL6844 with the C232HM‑DDHSL‑0 cable&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;br&gt;I would like to confirm the exact physical pins for SPI0 (CLK, MOSI, MISO, CS) and the GPIO handshake pin on the AWR6844EVM.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPIO Issue:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The R5F confirms GPIO Pin 5 toggles correctly (LOW/HIGH) using&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPIO_pinRead()&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, but the FTDI device always reads Bit 4 as HIGH. What could be causing this issue?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ADC Data Acquisition:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;How can I resolve the GPIO signal toggle issue to successfully acquire ADC data via SPI? Are there any recommended hardware connections or software configurations I should check?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thank you for your support.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>