https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/<p style="display:none;">blank</p>en-USTelligent Community 13https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1673040/tmag5124-q1-latch-output-at-power-up/6483588Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:59:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a2a4f703-1a50-4df9-a2b2-57be605db876Efe SatirogluHi Scott, Please find the latest test results attached. e2e.ti.com/.../hall_5F00_sensor_5F00_latch_5F00_up_5F00_2.pdf They used 2 boards, one with the standard configuration and another with 220ohm and a 8V voltage regulator. Please also find their comments below: In the first slide you can see the the regulated board connected to the slow and the fast power supply, It only starts correctly with the &#39;fast&#39; power supply. A thing to realize is about the &quot;dip&quot;. The first picture has no voltage dip and starts incorrectly And the second has a dip and starts right, so I&#39;d lean to the speed /slew rate of the PS more than the voltage dip. I tried to identify the oscillation frequency, I could measure 120KHz, however, I can see noise also in the voltage input It is hard to say if the noise comes from sensor current pull or directly from the PS. I measured the noise of power supply alone (with a resistive load) I could measure 50KHz. Do you think this is a clear indication of the slew rate rather than the voltage dip? If so, do you think our validation team can provide some insight on the slew rate? Thank you and best regards, Efehttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1675461/awrl6844-socid-extraction-in-virgin-ti-awrl6844/6483531Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:13:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:907dd39a-aee9-477b-88eb-7e640aca2526Sarvesh DubeyHi Zeyad, Extracting SOCID for a HS-FS SoC is not possible. SOCID cannot be read from the EFUSE either. It needs to be done via the shared gel file or through the TIFS example once the device is converted into HS-SE. Best Regards, Sarveshhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1682241/tmcs1126-appropriate-device-selection-for-current-sensingTue, 15 Sep 2026 07:36:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4eb528db-5a67-4264-b722-de497dbc3bc7ttdPart Number: TMCS1126 Dear Technical Support Team, I am researching the TMCS1126. The following are the specifications I am considering. Could you please let me know if there are any precautions to take when using this device, or if there are other devices that would be more suitable? Supply voltage: 5V CMTI: 100 kV/us or higher Analog voltage output (Vout): 0–5V Reference voltage: Vref 2.5V (Vout – Vref = &#177;2.5V) Current measurement &#177;30A ⇒ TMCS1126A3x (&#177;32A) &#177;100A ⇒ TMCS1126ADx (&#177;120A) &#177;60A ⇒ TMCS1126A8x (&#177;60A) Best Regards, ttdEnergy infrastructureTMCS1126https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1679494/awr2243-awr2243-support-for-cw-or-stepped-frequency-cw-operation-and-raw-adc-capture/6483466Tue, 15 Sep 2026 07:31:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:22871ace-0067-48bc-b56a-9df2d614691eSamhitha BobbaHi Zhang, [quote userid=&quot;687270&quot; url=&quot;~/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1679494/awr2243-awr2243-support-for-cw-or-stepped-frequency-cw-operation-and-raw-adc-capture/6478800&quot;]Is there any test/debug mode that allows the mixer I/Q output at this pre-HPF node to be routed directly to the ADC , bypassing the high-pass filtering?[/quote] No, it&#39;s not possible to bypass HPF. Regards, Samhithahttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1682226/pga900-the-absolute-maximum-voltage-for-the-vout-pin-of-pga900Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:50:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5fcef7cc-63f7-4f61-9927-82b7f99f0453jinyan maPart Number: PGA900 Hello teams: Could you please provide the absolute maximum voltage for the Vout pin of PGA900. Thanks and best regards KimPGA900https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1681512/iwrl6432aop-ism-chirp-configuration-used-for-the-certification/6483375Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:14:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c3c43bde-1e2b-4fac-a414-b3e886580ff8Reshma HCHi, Thanks for your reply, My current configuration for the ISM band consuming less power, please tune the AvgPower consumption to as max as possible for better performance.https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1679696/awr2944evm-inquiry-regarding-an-error-when-loading-the-image-file-onto-the-awr2944evm-board/6483374Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:13:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3594274c-6801-494d-8ec3-f26e3a103bc8Nishchay Garge2e.ti.com/.../2055.sbl_5F00_qspi.release.tiimage e2e.ti.com/.../2055.sbl_5F00_uart_5F00_uniflash.release.tiimage Hi JUNYEONG OH , Can you try flashing these images once?https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1682182/opt3101evm-capture-data-from-evm-timed-out----no-data-received-from-evm-stopping-captureTue, 15 Sep 2026 04:50:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b6117915-7b45-462f-bcd5-a2e23e534580James ArdoPart Number: OPT3101EVM I got this new OPT3101EVM today and using the OPT3101EVM GUI, clicking the start capture does not do anything. Instead I&#39;m getting a: Capture data from EVM timed out -- no data received from EVM. Stopping capture. In the log. I did not do anything to the board, and the jumper shunt is still on it. Any clue?OPT3101EVMTest &amp; Measurementhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1681885/iwr6843aop-iwr6843aop----hw-trigger-via-sync_in-long-delay-to-first-output-frame-unreliable-at-10-hz/6483186Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:25:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b04c5307-818b-44ce-98b2-29220325d8cesiddique ahmed kotapaliHi Josh, Thanks for the details and the ICD reference. One thing I would like to clarify directly: separate from trigger-to-TLV latency (which I understand is processing dependent and outside of device specifications) - if a SYNC_IN pulse arrives outside the 150–300 &#181;s acceptance window, what actually happens? Specifically: Is the pulse ignored entirely, or deferred to the next available window? Does this introduce additional timing uncertainty on when the frame actually starts? In the thread you referenced, it is mentioned that exceeding this window can cause &quot;unintended behavior... not characterized or not supported by device firmware,&quot; but didn&#39;t specify what that behavior actually is, so I wanted to confirm directly for our case. Regards, Siddiquehttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1681803/awr2944evm-awr2944evm-device-identifies-correctly-over-rs232-butaccepts-no-firmware-by-any-path/6483176Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:13:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d2f5d0bb-992a-4197-854c-04d75c17fee8Roy WexlerThe problem is with the AWR2944EVM firmware not being downloaded when setting up RS232 not the DCA1000.https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1682153/awr1642-power-up-calibrationTue, 15 Sep 2026 03:00:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:68dc290e-6c27-4084-8573-54efe612e049yunli chengPart Number: AWR1642 The configuration is as follows: /* Populate the calibration configuration: */ calibrationCfg.dfeDataOutputMode = gMmwDssMCB.cfg.ctrlCfg.dfeDataOutputMode; calibrationCfg.u.chirpCalibrationCfg.enableCalibration = true; calibrationCfg.u.chirpCalibrationCfg.enablePeriodicity = true; calibrationCfg.u.chirpCalibrationCfg.periodicTimeInFrames = 10U; if (MMWave_start (gMmwDssMCB.ctrlHandle, &amp;calibrationCfg, &amp;errCode) &lt; 0) { /* Error: Unable to start the mmWave control */ System_printf (&quot;Error: MMWDemoDSS mmWave Start failed [Error code %d]\n&quot;, errCode); return -1; } AWR1642 RF startup failed with the following error: &quot;Error: MMWDemoDSS mmWave Start failed [Error code -204602898]&quot;. 1.Can I disable the RF startup calibration and periodic calibration? 2.How much impact would disabling them have on target measurement? 3.The frame period is 15 ms. Does enabling periodic calibration affect target measurement? I noticed that sometimes the measured target information is incorrect, and the target appears as a ray (line) for several consecutive frames.AWR1642https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1675791/awr2243-cascading/6483147Tue, 15 Sep 2026 02:38:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3dc51d1d-18d6-4130-a800-352fc7ec5132Shakti Singh ChauhanHello Shareef The 10- 15 dB Noise figure amplifier for the LO distribution is not good then? The Output power form the LO Sync out is 7dBM which is high for any LNA. Can you suggest us something for this?https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1669859/awr2944evm-custom-pcm-production-based-on-awr2944evm-design-cont/6483146Tue, 15 Sep 2026 02:36:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:05871c8c-724a-44fd-a294-cf2aa7abc83eAli SyedHi Arie, This is my understanding - the dielectric material is the same for the RO3003 RA and RO3003 ED. The difference between RA and ED is what you ask the FAB manufacturer to use for copper plating on the antennas. We will add a note on the documentation about the copper From what I have researched, you can substitute RO3003G2 for RO3003. Note that you will still need to ask for &quot;rolled annealed&quot; copper plating to reduce copper roughness. regards, Alihttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1681847/opt3001-q1-question-about-data-rise-fall-time/6483130Tue, 15 Sep 2026 02:20:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b5252b7d-3bb3-4a48-9bb7-a2a17b58b3d1Hironobu TomitaHi Daniel-san, Thank you for your reply. Just to be sure, let me confirm. Is it correct to understand that OPT3001-Q1 starts the transition of the read data from rising edge of SCL? Regards, Tomitahttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1682132/iwrl6432w-how-to-support-wcsp-gpio-configuration-in-sysconfig-and-mmwave-l-sdkTue, 15 Sep 2026 01:54:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:33a59adc-3268-479b-9ad6-a4d466f455cdJames AustrialPart Number: IWRL6432W Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MMWAVE-L-SDK , , SYSCONFIG Hi, SW: mmWave-L-SDK 05.05.04.02 Customer would like to use IWRL6432W GPIO_5(J9) as an I/O pin, but we cannot select this pin in CCS sysconfig. Do I need additional IWRL6432W WCSP chip support package to make it work? or this is a bug in sysconfig?MMWAVE-L-SDKSYSCONFIGIWRL6432Whttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1670862/dca1000evm-dca1000evm-no-longer-boots/6483093Tue, 15 Sep 2026 01:48:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:972c8a18-f7d1-4b30-aa0c-abd50517469aAli SyedHi, Looks like this has been resolved in this thread: (+) DCA1000EVM: DCA1000EVM suddenly stopped working - replacement requested - Sensors forum - Sensors - TI E2E support forums regards, Alihttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1682123/iwr6843isk-the-customer-needs-to-apply-for-the-documentsTue, 15 Sep 2026 00:44:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f7f93610-b4cd-4f9f-a12c-d17e2bac6ea0Alex liPart Number: IWR6843ISK Other Parts Discussed in Thread: IWR6843 The customer needs to apply for the functional safety diagnostic library, FMEDA, and Safety Manual materials for the IWR6843.IWR6843IWR6843ISKhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1680182/tmag5134-questions-regarding-ti-magnetic-sense-simulator-results-for-tmag5134-tmag5233-and-switching-threshold-tolerance-distribution/6482998Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:07:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:74449236-2dca-4d69-af10-dddbb0a955f3KyoheiHi Scott-san, Thank you for your update. I understand that the server maintenance is expected to take some more time. Regarding Question 2, &quot;the difference between the TMAG5134 simulation results and the TMAG5233 simulation results,&quot; am I correct in understanding that this is also due to an error in the database and that it is currently being corrected? Best regards, Kyoheihttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1681999/iwrl1432-4-20-ma-radar-level-transmitter/6482925Mon, 14 Sep 2026 22:12:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:8801f08a-335f-494b-8acf-b9b9f14bce94edsonemboaba1960Hi Josh Thanks for your prompt answer. Yes 77GHz band is appoved in Brasil for this case. I go ahead with design. Regardshttps://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1680182/tmag5134-questions-regarding-ti-magnetic-sense-simulator-results-for-tmag5134-tmag5233-and-switching-threshold-tolerance-distribution/6482854Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:03:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:23366e13-3531-4204-bf48-19c9f061ad80Scott BrysonKyohei, Thanks for your ongoing patience while we work through correcting the database. There will be some additional delay due to server maintenance that is ongoing and affecting my ability to deploy an update. Thanks, Scott