This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
FDC2112: FDC2112 LSB resolution using a 4 pF sensor
Part Number: FDC2112
Hi! My application for the FDC2114 involves capacitance sensing of two pads that are spaced <5um apart. The datasheet says:
The single-ended configuration allows higher sensing range than the differential configuration for a given total sensor plate area. In applications in which high sensitivity at close proximity is desired, the differential configuration performs better than the single-ended configuration.
Could you elaborate on why the differential configuration performs better? Thank you!
In the differential configuration, two conductive plates are connected to IN0A and IN0B. This results in a higher change in frequency for the same change in distance in the target object compared to single-ended configuration. So, differential configuration performs better at close proximity.
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Sharath Vallamkonda:
It seems as though this would just require twice the electrode area, so its not actually increasing the sensitivity/area? I'll need to work out the equations to support this. Is that already done?
In reply to ikellymo:
I should add that all I am trying to do is gain as much sensitivity as possible from about 3pF total variation. I currently see about 5fF resolution on the FDC2114 with the gain maxed out.
Considering the below drawing with possible configurations (A) to (F), wouldn't (F) be the most sensitive, for a given area with sensor capacitance of 2C2? In differential configuration (C) there is 1/4 the sensitivity?
Please see additional details below
Yes, you are correct, F would be the most sensitive. We generally recommend differential sensor mode as it is a balanced sensor system where we measured lower noise with higher resolution.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.